Advanced Search Results
Shri Anant Ram Sarangal and Shri Vs. Balwant Bros. Pvt. Ltd., Shri
Company Law Board CLB
Oct-10-2006
Company
(2007)1CompLJ350
Shri. U.P. Mathur, Shri. Mathur
1. In this order I am considering CP No. 65/2005 filed under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 by Shri Anant Ram Sarangal and Shri Ajay Sarangal, Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 respectively alleging "oppression"...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPuneet Goel and ors. Vs. Three Aces Services Ltd. and ors.
Company Law Board CLB
Apr-17-2000
Company
Shri. U.P. Mathur
1. In this petition filed under Sections 397/ 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') in the matter of Three Aces Services Ltd. (the company), the only allegation relates to the illegal removal of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Mohan Bansal Vs. Bansal Gems Pvt. Ltd., Shri
Company Law Board CLB
Mar-04-2002
MRTP
Shri. U.P. Mathur
1. By means of this petition filed under Section 397 and 398 of the No.Companies Act 1956 (the Act) the petitioner has alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement against the respondents and has sought appropriate reliefs.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
B.S. Chowdhary and anr. Vs. Mrs. Indira Singh and ors.
Company Law Board CLB
Nov-05-1997
Land Acquisition
(1999)96CompCas425
1. The petitioners holding 950 equity shares of Rs. 100 each representing 31.67 per cent, of the total paid up capital of M/s.Picksonic Electronics Private Limited (the company) have filed this petition under section 397/398/ 402...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Michelle Jawad-al-fahoum Vs. Indo Saudi (Travels) Pvt. Ltd. and
Company Law Board CLB
Feb-10-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)93CompCas151
Shri. Choudhary
1. In the petition filed under Section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956, in the matter of Indo Saudi Travels Private Limited, when arguments were in progress, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBrij Mohan Bansal Vs. Bansal Gems (P.) Ltd.
Company Law Board CLB
Mar-04-2002
Company
1. By means of this petition filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) the petitioner has alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement against the respondents and has sought appropriate reliefs.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Surendra Goyal Vs. Nile Aqua Faucets P. Ltd. and ors.
Company Law Board CLB
Jun-29-2007
Land Acquisition
(2008)142CompCas634
Shri. Rajeev Kumar
1. In this order I am considering Company Petition No. 18 of 2006 filed by Shri Surendra Goyal under Sections 397 and 398, of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') alleging certain...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Sandeep Kaur Ahluwalia Vs. Mukat Pipes Ltd. and ors.
Company Law Board CLB
Feb-14-2007
Land Acquisition
(2007)138CompCas33
Shri. Anil K. Aggarwal
1. In this order I am considering two cross company petitions viz. CP No. 112/05 filed under Section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and CP No. 01/111A/CLB/WR of 2006...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbani Bhusan Bhattacharya Vs. Ericsson India P. Ltd.
Company Law Board CLB
Sep-16-1997
MRTP
1. This is a petition filed under Section 237(b) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking investigation into the affairs of Ericsson India Limited ("the company"). According to the petitioner, at the time of incorporation of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Jersey India Ltd.
Company Law Board CLB
Feb-12-1997
Land Acquisition
(1997)88CompCas864
1. This is a unique petition filed by Jersey India Limited (hereinafter called "the company") under Section 79 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter called "the Act"), praying for sanction for issue of 23,88,000 equity shares...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »