Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shri tripathi · Page 1 of about 191 results (0.214 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 23 1993

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Dharamchand L. Shah Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-23-1993

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act 1961 - Sections 27(1), 69A, 143, 144, 147, 265(1), 271(1) and 274(2)

Reported in : [1993]204ITR462(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Dr. V. Balasubramaniam, Adv.

U.T. Shah, J.1. In this reference, the Revenue is challenging the action of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal), in cancelling the penalty imposed under section 27(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 20 2005

Santosh @ Dankya Subhash Gaikwad Vs. D.N.Jadhav, Commissioner of Polic ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-20-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slum Lords, Boot Leggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 5A; National Security Act - Sections 5A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 323, 324 and 504 ;Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 2006(1)MhLj88

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Tripathi, Adv.

S.R. Sathe, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner is challenging the order of detention passed against him by the Respondent No.1, the Commissioner of Police, Pune on 17.11.2004...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 1996

Vijay Changdeo Patil Vs. Satish Sahney, Commissioner of Police, Greate ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-07-1996

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1997(1)ALT(Cri)11; 1997CriLJ185

Advocate for Appellant : U.N. Tripathi, Adv.

S.V. Savant, J. 1. Heard both the learned counsel. 2. This is a petition by the detenu himself challenging his detention under the order dated 11th August, 1995 issued by the first respondent Commissioner of Police,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 14 2007

Amru S/O. Shivcharan Gond Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Sep-14-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008CriLJ284

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. R.P. Tripathi, Shri. Tripathi

L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. By this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Cr. P.C. the accused/appellant has questioned legality and correctness of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20th November, 2001, passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2012

Adil Chaus Son of Hamad Chaus. Vs. the Commissioner of Police.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-16-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Section 3(1), 8; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 468, 471, 420, 34 ; Arms Act - Section 4, 7, 25, 27; Bombay Police Act - Section 142, 135; Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Section 3

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Tripathi

 (Per Naresh H Patil, J.) 1) Heard. 2) Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 3) The petitioner challenges order of detention passed on 30-8-2011 by the Commissioner of Police Aurangabad under section 3(1) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2011

Union of India Through Its Secretary, and ors. Vs. Rabinder Singh.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-29-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 177; Army Act, 1950 - Section 191

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Tripathi

1. This appeal by Union of India through the Secretary to Government, Ministry of Defence seeks to challenge the judgment and order passed by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in L.P.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2009

Rohtash (Minor) and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-18-2009

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC284

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. N.C. Tripathi, Shri. Tripathi, Shri. Radhey Shyam

A.P. Sahi, J.1. Heard Shri N.C. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Shri R.K. Saini, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 6 and the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1995

Ashwani Kumar and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar and Others, Etc. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-16-1995

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 141, 162, 226, 309 and 323A; General Rules - Rule 35; Administrative Tribunals Act - Sections 14(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1996SC2833; JT1995(8)SC563; (1997)IILLJ856SC; 1995(6)SCALE779; (1996)7SCC577; [1995]Supp5SCR367

ORDERK. Ramaswamy, J.1. Leave granted.2. This bunch of appeals pertains to 1363 employees, viz., Clerks (Class III) and Attendants (Class IV), All the cases arise from judgments of Division Bench of the Patna High Court dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2012

Rama Shankar Pandey Vs. S.K.Paul

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. D.K.Tripathi, Shri. Tripathi

Con.C.No.1109/2011 12.12.2012 Shri D.K.Tripathi, counsel for petitioner. Shri Aditya Adhikari, counsel for respondent. Learned counsel for respondent submitted that the matter is in active investigation of respondent. The complaint which is on page 11 is in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1988

Jivanlal Jasangdas Patel and 4 Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-01-1988

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1988)(17)LC609Tri(Mum.)bai

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Tripathi

The Collector of Central Excise, Baroda, by his Order No. 3/MP/81, dated 2.11.1981 ordered absolute confiscation of primary gold weighing 5.800 gms valued at Rs. 812.00 and also ordered confiscation of primary gold weighing 46.200 gms...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial