Advanced Search Results

Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board Vs. Easun Engineering Co.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 133, 134-A; Letters And Patent - Clause 36

Reported in : (2002)10SCC458

D.P. Wadhwa and; M.B. Shah, JJ.1. This appeal has been preferred by Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (“the Board” for short) on a certificate granted by the Andhra Pradesh High Court under Article 133 read with...

H.H. Maharaja Bhanu Prakash Singh Vs. Tika Yogendra Chandra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Reported in : 1989Supp(1)SCC16

K.N. Singh,; M.P. Thakkar and; N.D. Ojha, JJ.1. Validity of a will having been concurrently upheld by the trial court and the High Court, the caveator has preferred the present appeal by special leave.2. A glance...

Hindustan Photo Films Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chenn ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Pushya Sitaraman, Senior Counsel for the Appellants. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR for the Respondent

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. Ms. Pushya Sitaraman, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant states that the appellants are a Public Sector Undertaking. Since they have not initially obtained necessary clearance from the...

Cce, Chennai Vs. Shri Krishna Ultramarine and Chemicals Ltd

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri T.H. Rao, SDR, for the Appellant. Shri M. Masilamani, Consultant for the Respondents.

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy 1. Heard both sides. 2. M/s. Shri Krishna Ultramarine and Chemicals Ltd., the respondents herein have their main manufacturing unit at Sriperumbudur and they have another repacking unit at Chennai. The respondents...

State of A.P. and anr. Vs. T. Yadagiri Reddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 8, 34, 38, 38A, 38B, 38E, 47, 48, 50, 50B and 50B(4); Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 13(1), 15, 16, 20, 20(5) and 21; Andhra Pradesh Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act

Reported in : JT2009(1)SC104

Advocate for Appellant : R. Sundaravardan, Sr. Adv.,; Manoj Saxena,; Rajneesh Kr. Sin

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. A Judgment by the High Court allowing a Civil Revision Petition, setting aside the order passed by the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal- cum-II Additional District Judge of Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter called `the...

Cce, Chennai Vs. M/S. Vibro Equipments

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Excise

Advocate for Appellant : Shri T.H. Rao, SDR for the Appellant

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Nobody is present on behalf of the respondents despite notice. Heard the learned SDR Shri T.H. Rao appearing for the Department. The impugned order has been challenged by the Department on the...

Cce, Trichy Vs. M/S. Godrej Sara Lee Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri T.H. Rao, SDR for the Appellant. None for the Respondents.

The respondents are not present. There is also no adjournment request. Heard the learned SDR Shri T.H. Rao appearing for the Department. In this case the respondent-manufacturer has claimed credit of service tax paid on security...

Cc, TuticorIn Vs. M/S. Vishal CotspIn Lin

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Customs

Advocate for Appellant : Shri T.H. Rao, SDR, for the appellant. Shri R. Masillamoney, Consultant, for the respondent.

Per: Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy, Heard both sides. We find that the original authority as noted in his letter dated 07.01.2000 has examined the ratio of the decision of the Hon ble High Court of Madras in...

Cce, Coimbatore Vs. M/S. Ammarun Foundries

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri T.H. Rao, SDR for the Appellant.

No one is present on behalf of the respondents. Shri T.H. Rao, learned SDR appearing for the Revenue states that the issue of demanding interest in cases of late payment of duty involving price escalation have...

M/S. Aml Steels Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ch ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Excise

Advocate for Appellant : Smt. Prameela Viswanthan, Advocate for the Appellants. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR for the Respondent.

Heard both sides. Considering the fact that the entire amount of duty of Rs.54,755/- has been paid by the appellants before issue of the show-cause notice and promptly after detection of the case, the requirement of...