Advanced Search Results

State of Gujarat Vs. Rajubhai Dhamirbhai Bariya and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 9(6), 154, 156, 157, 161, 225, 311, 327, 378, 386 and 391; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 137, 141, 142, 143 and 165

Reported in : 2004CriLJ771; (2004)1GLR404

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Shelat, Adv. General,; Nitin M. Amin and; U.A. Triv

B. J. Shethna, J.1. Against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 27-6-2003 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Vadodara, in Sessions Case No. 248 of 2002 acquitting the respondents-accused for...

Suresh Chandra Bahri Vs. State of Bihar with Gurbachan Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 107, 120 (A and B), 201, 209, 300 and 302; Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 164, 306, 313, 342 and 354; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 114 and 133; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164, 306, 313, 342 and 354; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 114 and 133; Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952;

Reported in : AIR1994SC2420; 1994(2)BLJR1147; 1994CriLJ3271; JT1994(4)SC309; 1994(3)SCALE197; 1995Supp(1)SCC80; [1994]Supp1SCR483; 1994(2)LC782(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : K.B. Sinha,; Ashok Kumar Sharma and; J.P. Sharma, Advs

ORDERFaizan Uddin, J.1. In Sessions Trial No. 77/85 the appellants Suresh Bahri and Raj Pal Sharma were convicted under Section 302 of the Penal Code for causing murder of Urshia Bahri and her two children, namely,...

Tapubha Bhagvanji and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 114, 201 and 302; Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR2002SC2794; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)253; 2002CriLJ3733; 2002(4)Crimes134(SC); II(2002)DMC219SC; (2003)IGLR623; JT2002(6)SC559; 2002(5)SCALE391; (2002)6SCC530; 2002(2)LC1201(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar, Sr. Adv.,; Shailendra Narayan Singh and; Vimal

D.P. Mohapatra, J. 1. The five appellants in this appeal were accused No. 1 to 5 in Sessions Case No. 33/84 of the Court of Sessions Judge at Surendranagar and respondents in Criminal Appeal No. 19/85...

Dhananjay Sharma Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22(5), 32, 129, 142 and 144; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1995SC1795; 1995(2)ALT(Cri)340; 1996(1)BLJR352; JT1995(4)SC483; 1994(2)SCALE745; (1995)3SCC757; [1995]3SCR964; (1996)1UPLBEC203

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Malhotra,; Gopal Subramanium,; R.K. Jain,;

Dr. A.S. Anand, J.1. On 17.1.1994, Shri Parasmal Rampuria of C.R. Industries Limited filed a petition seeking issuance of a writ of habeas corpus for the release of Dhananjay Sharma from illegal and unauthorised custody of...

Karan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148, 149 and 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 145

Reported in : 2003(3)BLJR2004; JT2003(Suppl2)SC261; 2003(8)SCALE135; (2003)12SCC587

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar, Sr. Adv.,; Sanjay Jain,; Adolf Mathew,;

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. Appellants challenge their conviction and sentence for the offences punishable under Sections 148 and 307 of Indian Penal Code. Appellant Karan Singh was convicted for the offences punishable under Section 148 and 307...

Ram Manorath and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 149 and 302;

Reported in : 1981(1)SCALE527; (1981)2SCC654; [1981]3SCR195

Advocate for Appellant : Frank Anthony and; Sushil Kumar, Advs

1. Twelve persons were put up for trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bahraich on various charges, the principal charge being under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Penal Code. The learned Judge...

Mallanna and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149 and 302

Reported in : 105(2008)CLT120(SC); 2008(1)KarLJ1; 2007(11)SCALE194; (2007)8SCC523; 2007AIRSCW5917; 2007(6)AIRKarR219.

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar, Sr. Adv.,; B.P.S. Patil,; B. Subrahmanya Prasa

B.N. Agarwal, J.1. Sixteen accused persons were tried and by judgment rendered by the Trial Court all of them were acquitted of the charge under Section 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code ['IPC' for short]. Against...

Bheru Lal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 341, 427, 436 and 439

Reported in : AIR2009SC3208; 2009CriLJ4118; JT2009(11)SC674; 2009(11)SCALE40; (2009)9SCC119; 2009AIRSCW5142

Advocate for Appellant : Manish Singhvi, Addl. A.G.,; Sushil Kr. Jain,; Pratibha Jain

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of the Criminal Appeal No. 898 of 2004 filed by three appellants as also the Special Leave Petition filed by the State of Rajasthan against the acquittal of one...

Kripal Singh S/O Panna Lal, and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Criminal

Acts : The Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 302 Read with Section 34 ; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 27 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Sushil Kumar Tiwari, Adv.

1. Appellants have filed this appeal against the judgment dated 02.07.2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ashta District Sehore in Sessions Trial No.198/2000 convicting the appellants under section 302 read with section 34 of the...

Ghulam DIn Buch Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313

Reported in : 1996IIIAD(SC)526; AIR1996SC1568; 1996(2)ALD(Cri)137; 1996CriLJ2291; 1996(2)Crimes29(SC); JT1996(4)SC515; 1996(3)SCALE271; (1996)9SCC239; [1996]3SCR1121

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar,; P. Wadhwani,; Purnima Bhatt and;

ORDER1. The 1975 accord with Sheikh Abdullah saw a dynamic person from Ladakh coming to the fore. He was made a Minister. He wanted to do many things for Ladakhis. One of the projects which the...