Advanced Search Results
The Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Maruti Udyog Ltd.
Gujarat
Jan-17-2005
CustomsConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Customs Act - Sections 130A
(2005)3GLR2015
Asim J. Pandya, Adv. for Petitioner No. 1
B.J. Shethna, J.1. The petitioner, Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Customs House, Kandla, has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the impugned Judgment and order dated 22.2.2001 (Annexure :...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeepak Fertilisers and Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Nhava
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-05-2001
MRTP
(2002)(139)ELT328Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The appellants imported "brimstone 90" (agriculture sulphur) and claimed classification under heading 25.03 and benefit of Notification No. 11/97-Cus dated 01/03/1997 at serial No. 19. The Assistant Commissioner in his order accepted the classification but...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoromandel Fertilizers Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Oct-13-2006
Land Acquisition
(2007)(116)ECC45
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Original No. 28/2005 dated 22.12.2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam holding that the imported molten sulphur in crude form falling under Chapter Heading 2503 undergoing a process of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Patel Engineering Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import) ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Mar-01-2012
Customs
For the Appellants : V. Sridharan, Prakash Shah, Mihir Deshmukh, Advocates. For the Respondents : Shri Y.K. Agarwal, SDR.
Shri Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial) By these appeals, the appellants have challenged the impugned order denying the duty exemption granted under Notification 21/02 dated 1.3.2002 and confiscation of the imported capital goods i.e. ‘Payer Finisher’ which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Central Excise Vs. Tikitar Industries
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-10-2000
Excise
(2000)(118)ELT468TriDel
1. The Common issue involved in these nine appeals is whether the process of conversion of straight grade bitumen into air blown grade bitumen amounts to manufacture.2.1 The facts in brief in appeal No. E/4498/93-C are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSinghal Paints Pvt Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-20-1995
Excise
(1995)(78)ELT22TriDel
Shri. V. Sridharan
1. M/s. Singhal Paints Pvt. Ltd. have filed this appeal against Order-in-original No. MP(23/89) 16 of 1990, dated 20-9-1990 passed by Collector of Central Excise, Allahabad whereby he had confiscated the quantities mentioned in the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeetharama Rao Vs. Karnataka Appellate Tribunal
Karnataka
Sep-08-1986
ServiceTrusts and Societies
Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 107
ILR1987KAR825
B.G. Sridharan, Adv.
ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. This matter was heard at the stage of preliminary hearing on 21-8-1986. Learned Government Pleader Shri Somayaji was directed to seek instructions and submit. He was also furnished with a copy of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Greatship (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-I a ...
Mumbai
Apr-28-2015
Service Tax
B.R. Gavai, J. 1. An interesting question as to whether the Notification No. 14/2010-ST dated 27.2.2010 is clarificatory / declaratory in nature or as to whether it brings about substantive change in law arises for consideration...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Madhusudan Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-06-1991
Land Acquisition
(1993)LC218Tri(Delhi)
Shri. Gopal Prasad
1. These appeals relate to common issues. The same were, therefore, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. The appellants are manufacturers of cellulosic spun yarn/non-cellulosic spun yarn in their factories. They...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTriveni Sheet Glass Works Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-26-1993
Land Acquisition
(1996)(83)ELT192TriDel
1. M/s. Triveni Sheet Glass Works Limited, have filed an appeal being aggrieved from the order passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Allahabad. The said appeal was presented in the Registry on the 16th day...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »