Advanced Search Results

Ramkrishna Pandey Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(2)MPHT164

A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22-1-1996 passed by learned V Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Jabalpur in Special Case No. 06/95 convicting appellant under Sections...

The British India Corporation Limited Vs. the Market Committee and anr ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961

Reported in : (1997)116PLR634

Advocate for Appellant : Ramesh Kumar, Adv.

N.K. Aggarwal, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, for quashing demand notice dated 16.8.1973 issued by the Market Committee, Dhariwal, District Gurdaspur, and the recovery notice dated 20.11.1983 issued by the...

Ram Singh Vs. the State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ramesh Kumar

1 Cr. A. No.2207/1996 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH JABALPUR Criminal Appeal No.2207/1996 Ram Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present :Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Gupta. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Name of counsel for the parties: Shri Ramesh...

Jainarayan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ramesh Kumar Tiwari

1 W.P. No.8489/2012 Jainarayan Singh vs. State of M.P. & Ors. 19.06.2012 Heard Shri Ramesh Kumar Tiwari learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition...

Sanjeev Kumar Dwivedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ramesh Kumar Tiwari

WRIT PETITION No.15246/201”14. 09.2012 Shri Ramesh Kumar Tiwari, learned Counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Yogesh Dhande, learned Dy. Govt. Advocate, for the respondents-State. The petitioners claim grant of regular pay scale from the initial date of appointment....

Manohar Lal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ramesh Kumar

Writ Petition No :14546. / 2012 Manohar Lal versus State of Madhya Pradesh 05.02.2013. Shri Ramesh Kumar for the applicant. Shri S.S.Bisen, Government Advocate, for the State. Heard. Case diary perused. Applicant has been arrested in...

Smt. Asha Shrivastava Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ramesh Kumar Tiwari

1 Writ Petition No.21285 / 2013 13/1/2014 :- Shri Ramesh Kumar Tiwari, counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Dy. Advocate General for the State. Heard on the question of admission. It is contended in the...

K. Ponnambalam Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Trichy

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Ramesh Kumar, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri C. Rangaraju, SDR for the Respondent.

Per Dr. Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. Shri Ramesh Kumar, Advocate appearing for the appellant states that the redemption fine and penalty imposed in this case are unreasonably high and he seeks reduction in the same....

Ahluwalia and Co. and ors. Vs. Surinder Mohan and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8

Reported in : (2004)137PLR684

Advocate for Appellant : Sudeep Mahajan, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J.1. (29th January, 2004) - Defendant No. 1 has approached this Court through the present revision petition. The challenge is to order dated January 17, 2003 passed by the learned trial Court. Vide the...

Ramesh Kumar Vs. M.D. University

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : (2000)125PLR303

Advocate for Appellant : Sewa Singh, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J.1. Vide this judgment I will dispose of two S.A.O. Nos. 33 and 34 of 1999, titled Ramesh Kumar v. M.D. University, Rohtak, as both these appeals have arisen from the order dated 9.4.1999,...