Advanced Search Results
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jun-19-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(83)ECC30
Shri. Rajesh Chander Kumar
1. Whether worn out and damaged goods/waste are excisable goods and whether they are chargeable to excise duty is an issue to be considered herein.2. Shri Rajesh Chander Kumar submitted that the plant was constructed as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrashanth Cylinders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Mar-20-1998
Service Tax
(1998)LC403Tri(Chennai)
Shri. Rajesh Chander Kumar
1. Appellant had filed ten price lists during the months of September and October 1993 for declaration of assessable value of LPG cylinders manufactured on job work basis with the materials provided by customers Indian Oil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiddhi Polymer (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Dec-02-2003
Excise
(2004)(166)ELT348Tri(Bang.)
Shri. Rajesh Chander Kumar
1. After hearing for sometime with reference to the stay petition filed by the party, we find that the matter itself can be disposed off.2. Shri Rajesh Chander Kumar appearing for the appellants submitted that in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Goetze (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Dec-05-2003
MRTP
(2004)(165)ELT473Tri(Bang.)
Shri. Rajesh Chander Kumar
1. This appeal arises out of and is directed against the Order-in-Original dtd. 27-9-2000 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore. The issue relates to determination of the value of the goods, which were captively...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Wipro Ltd., Bangalore Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Sep-26-2001
Service Tax
(2001)(78)ECC321
Shri. Rajesh Chander Kumar
1. This stay application is filed by the applicants for the waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 3,26,965/-. Shri Rajesh Chander Kumar appearing for the appellant submitted that out of Rs. 3,26,965/-, a sum...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCotekar Electronics Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jul-30-2003
Land Acquisition
(2004)(163)ELT94Tri(Bang.)
Shri. Rajesh Chander Kumar
1. The short point to be considered in this case is whether Ultra Seal Cascade Washing Machine is exempted or not in terms of Notification 65/1994, dated 1-3-1994.3. Shri Rajesh Chander Kumar, appearing for the appellant,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWipro Ge Medical Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Customs and Central
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-07-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(59)ECC441
Shri. Rajesh Chander Kumar
1. This appeal is directed against the orders passed by the Commissioner of Customs & C. Ex. in Order No. 233/95 (B) OIA No. 139/96 dt 18.9.96. In terms of that order he confirmed the orders...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenus Metal Works Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-31-1997
Service Tax
(1998)(98)ELT257TriDel
1. The appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bangalore upholding the order of the Assistant Collector and rejecting the appeal filed by the appellant before him. By his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenus Metal Works Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-01-1998
Service Tax
(1998)(102)ELT80TriDel
1. The above application arises out of the Tribunal's Final Order No.2019/97-A, dated 31-10-1997 -1998 (98) E.L.T. 257 (Tribunal).2. According to the applicants/appellants, the error arises in not recording any finding on their consistent claim for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahadev Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-08-1999
Service Tax
(2000)LC798Tri(Chennai)
1. The appellants have filed 18 appeals for different periods against five Orders-in-Appeal. However, issue in each of these appeals is the same and therefore, by common consent of both sides, the same are being considered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »