Advanced Search Results
Laxmi Devi Singhal and Another Vs. Kailash Singhal
Madhya Pradesh
Oct-27-2015
Land Acquisition
Shri. Raja Sharma
1. In view of commonality of facts and issues involved, on the joint request, matters were analogously heard and are decided by this common order. Facts are taken from M.Cr.C.147/2014 2. In these petitions filed under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKallu and ors. Vs. Antulal and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jun-20-2008
Civil
2008(5)MPHT62
Shri. Raja Sharma
Subhash Samvatsar, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the defendant being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 15-7-1998 delivered by First Additional District Judge, Gwalior in Civil Appeal No. 9-A/98 whereby the First Appellate Court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAwtaar Singh Vs. Regional Transport Authority and anr.
Chhattisgarh
Nov-17-2008
Motor Vehicles
2009(1)MPHT95(CG)
Satish K. Agnihotri, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 12-6-2008 (Annexure P-1) passed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'STAT') in Revision No. 107/2007 (Kanker Roadways v. Avtar...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rakesh Sharma and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-30-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226
1) Leave granted. 2) These appeals are directed against the judgment and final order dated 18.01.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur, Bench at Gwalior in Writ Petition Nos. 1873, 1878...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawan Kumar Dewangan Vs. Rama Dewangan
Chhattisgarh
Nov-17-2011
Land Acquisition
(FIRST APPEAL UNDER SECTION 28 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955) 1. The appeal, in a matrimonial case, is by the husband is directed against the judgment and decree dated 23.06.1998 passed by the 5th Additional...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyamlal Vyas Vs. Inderchand JaIn and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-20-2007
Contempt of Court
AIR2008MP15; 2007(4)MPHT366
Shri. Ashok Vailankar, Shri. H.D. Gupta
ORDERA.K. Gohil, J.1. Petitioner has filed two contempt petitions in which Shri Ashok Vailankar is appearing as an Advocate/Lawyer on behalf of petitioner. There was an objection that he cannot appear, act or plead in the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanker Roadways Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Chhattisgarh
Nov-05-2012
Education
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION C No 784 of 2012 Kanker Roadways ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh & Others ...Respondents ! Shri Gautam Bhaduri Advocate for the petitioner ^ Shri Sumesh Bajaj Government...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›