Advanced Search Results
K.C. Chakraborty Vs. Indian Trade Promotion Organisation
Delhi
Jan-18-2002
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
2002IIAD(Delhi)409; 96(2002)DLT744
Party in perso
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. The petitioner, who is employed with Indian Trade Promotion Organisation, is aggrieved by his non-regularisation to the post of Deputy General Manager to which post the petitioner was initially appointed on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRavi Raj Gupta and anr. Vs. M/S Hansraj Gupta and Co. and ors.
Delhi
Jun-03-2011
Company Law
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 299; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 91
Mr. Vijay Jhanji; Mr. G.K. Mishra; Mr. P.N. Singh, Advs.
1. The present appeal lays a challenge to an order dated 17th February, 2009 whereby the learned Single Judge has held that the suit filed by the plaintiffs is not maintainable being frivolous and dismissed the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.K. Gupta Vs. Delhi Administration, Etc.
Delhi
Jan-20-1978
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226(3)
ILR1978Delhi82
B. Kirpal,; Farhat Qadri,; Madan Lokur,;
V.S. Deshpande (1) A question of first impression arises in this writ petition, namely, whether the availability of a suit in a civil court to the petitioner is 'any other remedy' within the meaning of clause...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Patel Chemical Works Vs. Income Tax Officer
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Aug-06-1999
Direct Taxation
1. This appeal, filed by the assesses, is directed against the order dt. 26th Feb., 1993. passed by the CIT(A)-II, Ahmedabad, for asst. yr.1982-83 whereby a penalty of Rs. 2,12,332 levied under Section 217(l}(c) has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCore Health Care Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Jun-06-2000
Direct Taxation
(2001)70TTJ(Ahd.)490
These two cross-appeals: one by the assessee and the other by the revenue relating to assessment year 1992-93 are taken up together and disposed of by a common order for the sake of convenience.In ITA No,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCore Health Care Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Jun-06-2000
Direct Taxation
1. These two cross-appeals; one by the assessee and the other by the Revenue relating to asst. yr. 1992-93 are taken up together and disposed of by a common order for the sake of convenience.2. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Tshering BhutiA. Vs. State of Sikkim.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-25-2011
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(2), 13(1)(e), 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 (CRPC) - Section 313
1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 11.12.2002 passed by the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2002, upholding the judgment and order dated 30.5.2002,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSk. Yusuf Vs. State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Jun-14-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 201; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 313; The Evidence Act - Section 27
1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 28.06.2006 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in C.R.A.No. 229 of 2000, by which it dismissed the appeal of the appellant against...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJawahar Yadav Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Chhattisgarh
Feb-13-2006
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 205, 376, 415, 419, 420, 467 and 468; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 195, 362, 439 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 21
2006CriLJ2078
Rajesh Pandey and; A.K. Prasad, Advs.
ORDERDilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 12-2-2004 passed by Shri A. K. Gaikwad, 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, Surguja whereby the judgment of acquittal order under Section 376, I.P.C. delivered on 24-1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKanhaiyalal Agarwal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Feb-27-2002
CommercialCivil
Constitution of India - Article 226(1) and 226(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 20 and 21; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976
2002(3)MPHT47; 2003(1)MPLJ426
R.N. Singh, Senior Adv., ;Naman Nagrath and ;R.K. Gupta, Advs.
ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J. 1. These Letters Patent Appeals (L.P.A. No. 173 of 2001, Kanhaiyalal Agarwal v. Union of India and Ors., L.P.A. No. 198 of 2001, Hukumchand Constructions v. Union of India and Ors., and L.P.A....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »