Advanced Search Results
M/S. Sri Vignesh Textiles Vs. Cce, Coimbatore
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Nov-27-2009
Service Tax
Shri R. Balagopal, Conslt. for the appellant. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR, for the respondent.
Shri R. Balagopal, Ld. Consultant, appearing for the appellants fairly states that the appellants are not contesting the duty liability which has been discharged well before the issue of Show Cause Notice. However, he pleads for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNmvst Alloy Cast Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Mar-09-2010
Service Tax
Shri R.Balagopal, Consultant. Shri C.Dhanasekaran, SDR.
Heard both sides. Shri R.Balagopal, ld. consultant appearing for the appellants states that the appellants were not aware that there was service tax liability on them as recipients of the GTA service. As soon as the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCpg Textiles Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-08-2004
Excise
(2004)(97)ECC130
1. By this appeal, the appellants challenge the Order-in-Original No.82/95 dated 27,7.95 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore, by which the Commissioner has demanded a total duty of Rs. 1,02,804/- from the appellants under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Lakshmi Bleachers Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Sep-24-2004
Land Acquisition
(2004)(117)LC583Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 23 months and 4 days in filing the appeal on the ground that the impugned order was received on 10.1.2002.2. Appearing on behalf of the applicants...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndia Metal and Alloys Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Feb-22-2010
Right to Information
Shri R.Balagopal, Consultant, Shri C.Rangaraju, SDR.
Per Jyoti Balasundaram The authorities below have confirmed a demand of duty of Rs.20,468/- on Amber Charkhas manufactured by the appellants herein, by denying exemption in terms of Notification No.198/87 dt. 28.8.87 as amended on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakshmi Bleachers and Another Vs. Commissioner of C.Ex., Salem and Ano ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Nov-24-2009
Right to Information
Shri R.Balagopal, Consultant, Shri T.Ramesh, Advocate, Shri V.V.Hariharan, JCDR
Per Jyoti Balasundaram The assessees herein undertook the process of dyeing of polycot sarees with the aid of power. It has been held that the process of dyeing undertaken by them amounts to manufacture and a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Venus Rubber Vs. Cce, Coimbatore
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Nov-06-2009
Excise
Shri R. Balagopal, Consultant, for the appellant. Shri T.H. Rao, SDR, for the respondent.
Per: P.K. Das, The relevant facts of the case in brief are that, the appellants were engaged in the manufacture of various rubber products specified under Chapter 40 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Encee Granites (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce, Salem
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Jul-06-2011
FERA
For the Appellants: R. Balagopal, Consultant. For the respondents: A.B. Niranjan Babu, Advocate.
Per: Jyoti Balasundaram, 1. The Ld. Consultant Shri R. Balagopal, States that he has no instructions to pursue the above appeal. The Registry has also issued fresh notice for today’s hearing and it is returned undelivered....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›