Advanced Search Results

Smt. Manju Baradia Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 304-A and 338; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 9 and 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2001CriLJ3762; 2001(3)MPHT57(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Prashant Mishra, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. The applicant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 23rd March, 2001 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 326/99 by the learned Sessions Judge, Raipur, confirming the conviction of the applicant under Section 304A...

Commandant 11th Battalion and ors. Vs. Mahendra Singh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Vishesh Sashastra Bal Niyam, 1973 - Rules 34 to 38, 47, 48, 50, 51 and 262 to 275-A; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulations 214, 262, 270 and 270(1); Constitution of India - Article 227; Madhya Pradesh Vishesh Sashastra Bal Adhiniyam, 1968 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4, 27, 27(1) and 27(2)

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT70(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Shukla, Dy. Adv. General

ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek to challenge the correctness, validity and propriety of the order dated 18-2-2000 passed in O.A. No. 1207/89...

Shahid and Others Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 50; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT139(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Prashant Mishra, Adv.

R.S. Garg, J.1. This judgment shall dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 786/2000, Criminal Appeal No. 959/2000 and Criminal Appeal No. 843/2000.2. The prosecution case in brief is that on 20-5-99, Sub- Inspector, S.B. Meshram, was on...

Madhusudan S/O Kriparam Dansena Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 320, 320(8), 362 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 354; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1998(2)MPLJ278

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Mishra, Adv.

ORDERS.C. Pandey, J.1. This is an application Under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for compounding the offence Under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled...

V.K. Walnekar and ors. Vs. Bilaspur Raipur Kshetriya GramIn Bank and a ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 21, 22, 23, 25, 28, 33, 78 and 79; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 49, 52, 54 and 57; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 108; Bihar Reorganization Act, 2000 - Sections 84 and 85; Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 141 and 225; Madhya Pradesh Uchaha Nyayalay (Letters Patent Appeals Samapti) Adhiniyam, 1981

Reported in : AIR2006Chh92

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Shukla,; G.S. Agrawal,; B.K. Rawat,;

Sunil Kumar Sinha, J. 1. In this batch of appeals, a question to be considered is whether the Letters Patent Appeals are maintainable in this High Court?2. The resume necessary for adjudication is as under:The State...

Alok Nigam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR2007Chh81

L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. As there was difference of opinion in the order dated 19th December, 2006 between Hon'ble the then Chief Justice and Hon'ble Shri Justice Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh on the question of maintainability of these...

K.P. Sugandh Limited and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Food Adulteration

Reported in : 2008CriLJ1830; 2008(3)MPHT29(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Parag Kotecha

Dhirendra Mishra, J.1. The petitioners of these two writ petitions have questioned the legality, correctness and constitutional validity of the order dated 31-12-2007 passed by the Controller, Food and Drugs Administration and Food (Health) Authority, Chhattisgarh...

Dum Ram and Another Vs. Bhanwar Lal and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT3(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Tripathi, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Garg, Ag. C.J.1. By this petition under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, petitionerseeks to challenge the correctness, validity and propriety of the order dated 4-1-99, passed in Civil Suit No. 20-A/92 by the...

State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Tirathram and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 395, 395(1), 395(2), 397, 397(1) and 401

Reported in : 2003(2)MPHT65(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Mishra, Adv. for; Suresh Yadu and; Anjana Trive

ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. This reference has been made by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baloda Bazaar, Raipur, under Section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which has been registered as Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 2636/2001.2....

Mohammad Hanif Qureshi Vs. Kailashchand and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8 - Order 14, Rule 1 - Order 18, Rules 1 and 2 - Order XLI, Rule 27 and 27(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 110

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT27(CG)

Advocate for Appellant : Prashant Mishra, Adv.

ORDERR.S. Garg, J.1. The present applicant Hazi Mohammad Hanif Qureshi filed a civil suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Class-II, Sakti. The said civil suit was registered as Civil Suit No. 86-A/1993. In the said...