Advanced Search Results

Nagpur Kshatriya Khattik Samaj and ors. Vs. Corporation of the City of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 3(2), 57(1), 70, 78, 348, 415(35) and 419; Central Provinces and Berar Municipalities Act, 1922 - Sections 20, 37, 38, 38(1), 42, 70(2), 78, 140, 178(5), 179, 179(1) and 180; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(G), 70, 226 and 227; City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948; General Clauses Act - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR1959Bom112; (1959)61BOMLR468; ILR1959Bom1047

Advocate for Appellant : M.R. Bobde, ;D.L. Jayawant and ;S.G. Kukde, Advs.

Y.S. Tambe, J. 1. The aforesaid applications will be disposed of by this judgment. In our opinion, it would be convenient to dispose of all these applications by this common judgment, as they arise out of...

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Phadke, Mr. Tathagat Sharma

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR R WRIT PETITION NO. 10234 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 10363 OF...

Canara Bank vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Phadke, Mr. Tathagat Sharma

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR R WRIT PETITION NO. 10234 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 10363 OF...

Bank of Baroda vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Phadke, Mr. Tathagat Sharma

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR R WRIT PETITION NO. 10234 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 10363 OF...

The Karnataka Bank Ltd vs the Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Phadke, Mr. Tathagat Sharma

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR R WRIT PETITION NO. 10234 OF 2020 (T-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 10363 OF...

Union of India and anr. Vs. Charanjit S. Gill and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 34 to 68, 69, 71, 108, 109, 110, 112, 118, 130, 153, 154, 158, 160, 162, 164, 191 and 192; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 37, 39, 40, 44, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 60, 61, 62, 66(1), 69, 70, 71, 89, 102, 103, 105, 113 and 129; Army Rules, 1959; Indian Army Act, 1911; U.K. Act; Court Martial (Appeals) Act, 1951; Court Martial (appeals) Act, 1968; Uniform Code of Military Justice Act, 1950; Administration of justice Act, 1968; Military Justice Act, 1968; Constitution of India - Article 71(2), 233 and 235; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 107(2)

Reported in : AIR2000SC3425; JT2000(5)SC135; 2000(4)SCALE221; (2000)5SCC742; 2000(2)LC1317(SC); (2000)2UPLBEC1642

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Phadke

ORDERR.P. Sethi, J.1. Leave granted.2. Finding that the Judge Advocate was lower in rank to the accused facing trial before a General Court Martial (hereinafter referred to as 'GCM'), the Division Bench of the High Court...

Smt. Raminder Duggal Vs. Kendriya Vidayalya Sangathan and

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT

Subject : Education

Reported in : (2005)(2)SLJ357CAT

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.G. Phadke, Shri. Phadke

1. Since issues raised in these cases are interlinked and have common facts, they are being taken up by the present common order.2. In O.A. No. 781/2003, validity of Memorandum of Charge dated 14.10.2003 has been...

Smt. Tripti Dutta, Prt, Group C, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Phadke

1. Applicant in OA 2184/2007 obtained B-Ed degree in the year 1987 from Mahila Gram Vidhyapitha, Prayag, Allahabad and joined as a Primary Teacher in Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangthan (KVS) on 29.10.1988 whereas applicant in OA 242/2008...

Jugal Kishore Jodhalal Vs. Bombay Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Tenancy Law; Berar Regulation of Agricultural Leases Act, 1951 - Sections 3, 4(1), 4(2) and 4A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 16; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Berar Regulation of Agricultural Leases (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 4; Berar Regulation of Agricultural Leases Rules - Rules 21, 32(2) and 114(1)

Reported in : AIR1959Bom81; (1958)60BOMLR1075; ILR1959Bom123

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Phadke, Adv.

Y.S. Tambe, J. 1. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Lal Jugalkishore seeks to get quashed the order of the first respondent, the Bombay Revenue Tribunal, dated...

Corporation of the City of Nagpur Vs. the Nagpur Electric Light and Po ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 24(1) and 52; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(39); Constitution of India - Article 226; City of Nagpur Corporation Act - Sections 420(2); Companies Act - Sections 163(1)

Reported in : AIR1958Bom498; (1958)60BOMLR1446; ILR1959Bom592

Advocate for Appellant : N.L. Abhyankar and ;S.M. Hajarnavis, Advs.

Mudholkar, J. 1, This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of mandamus to the Nagpur Electric Light and Power Company Ltd., respondent in this petition, directing it...