Advanced Search Results

Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Private Limited Vs. Govindbhai Appaji Bhatte and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 97, 98, 99, 100 and 101; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule I - Article 65; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 13; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 61; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 97, 98, 99, 100 and 101

Reported in : 1994(1)BomCR211

Advocate for Appellant : I.M. Chagla, ;M.B. Rele, ;N.G. Thakkar and ;A.J. Almeida, Advs., i/b., Hiralal Thakkar & Company

M.L.pendse, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by original decree holder in Suit No. 349 of 1970 to challenge legality of judgment dated September 8, 1989 passed by learned Single Judge on Chamber Summons No. 245...

Apar Private Limited Vs. D.K. Karnik and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23 (1); Collector acquiring flats under Requisition Act, 1948

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR510

Advocate for Appellant : K.D. Parikh, Adv., i/b., Marchand Mangaldas & Hiralal Shroff & Co.

D.J. Moharir, J.1. This is an appeal by the former landlords of premises requisitioned under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 against the order of fixation of reasonable compensation to be paid to them annually.2. The...

Phoenix Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1985(4)ECC286; 1983(14)ELT2113(Bom)

Pendse, J.1. The issue involved in this petition stands concluded by the decision of Mr. Justice Shah in Miscellaneous Petition No. 1828 of 1979 decided on January 23, 1980. I have followed the decision of Mr....

The Phoenix Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1988(14)LC482(Bombay)

Pendse, J.1. The issue involved in this petition stands concluded by the decision of Mr. Justice Shah in Miscellaneous Petition No. 1828 of 1979 decided on January 23, 1980. I have followed the decision of Mr....

Godrej Soaps Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 4

Reported in : 1986(10)ECC174; 1986(25)ELT482(Bom)

1. Petitioner No. 1 Godrej Soaps Limited - is a company registered under the Companies Act and inter alia manufactures various types of soaps. By an agreement dated February 26, 1981 entered into with Reckitt &...

Plastics Packaging Private Ltd. Vs. D.N. Lal, Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1)

Reported in : 1991(51)ELT271(Bom)

1. By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging order dated November 27, 1967 passed by Joint Secretary to Government of India declining to entertain the...

Patel Aluminium Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 4

Reported in : 1991LC511(Bombay); 1991(56)ELT303(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri S.N. Parikh, Adv., i/b., ;M/s Kantial Underkat & Co.

A.V. Savant, J. 1. The first petitioner is a company manufacturing some aluminium products namely extruded shapes and sections, slugs etc. falling under Tariff Entry 27. From November 1980 onwards, the petitioner-Company filed the price list...

Jaysen Jayant Rele and ors. Vs. Shantaram Ganpat Gujar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(11); Maharashtra Rents Act

Reported in : AIR2002Bom462; 2002(6)BomCR415

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Parikh and ;Sheela Balsara, Advs.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. Like economics very often law also makes common sense difficult. The economists expound several theories and the lawyers formulate several propositions of law based on Judicial pronouncements and their own legal acumen. Otherwise...

Abdur Rahim Undre Vs. Padma Adbur Rahim Undre

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Muslim Law; Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 1; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 44; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1982Bom341; 2(1982)DMC204

Advocate for Appellant : N.A. Mody and;S.H. Karim, Advs.

Dharmadhikari, J.1. The appellant-plaintiff Dr. Abdur Rahim under married Smt. Padma, respondent-defendant in the United Kingdom on 5th May 1966. At the time of marriage plaintiff Abdur Rahim was a Mohainmedan where as respondent Padma was...

Jitendra B. Mehta Vs. the Manager and 2 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act - Sections 78 and 79; Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 - Sections 11A, 25F, 25G and 25H; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227

Reported in : [2006(111)FLR183]

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, Adv. for Petitioner 1

H.K. Rathod, J.1. By order dated 20.6.2006, this petition was disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty in favour of petitioner to approach the concerned labour court. However, pursuant to order passed by this Court today...