Advanced Search Results

Shri Ravikant Suryaji Rasam Vs. Shri Anil Yashwant Dabbholkar

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Adv. Shri P.B. Sawant for appellant.

Oral Order:- Per Justice Mr. S.B. Mhase, Honble President: Perused the order passed by District Consumer Forum, Sindhudurga. No doubt in the present matter the appellant has filed a claim stating that certain works have not...

M/S. Haryax Sales Corporation, Through Prop.Shri Shrikant J. Mehta, Ka ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Adv. Shri P.B. Sawant for Appellant. Adv. Shri Sandeep Dhangar for Respondents.

Oral Order:- Per Justice Mr. B.B. Vagyani, Honble President: We heard Adv.Shri P.B.Sawant for the appellant and Adv.Shri Sandeep Dhangar for the respondents. Because of serious illness of cancer the present appellant could not appear before...

Waman Rao and ors Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 19, 31, 31(2), 31A(1), 31B, 31C, 352, and 368; Constitution of India (First Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 4; Constitution of India (Fourth Amendment) Act, 1955; House of the People (Extension of Duration) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976

Reported in : (1981)2SCC362; [1981]2SCR1; 1980 INSC 216

Advocate for Appellant : M.N. Phadke and; M.S. Gupta, Advs

Chandrachud, C.J.1. A ceiling on agricultural holdings was imposed in Maharashtra by the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 27 of 1961, which was brought into operation on January 26, 1962. The ceiling fixed by...

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(4), (5) and (6); Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000 - Rules 4(7), 8(7), 9(1) and (6)

Reported in : AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

Advocate for Appellant : Rajani Iyer and ;C.U. Singh, Advs. in W.P. No. 1147 of 2002 i/b., ;Thakore Jariwala & Associates in W.P. No. 1147 of 2002 and ;Hutoxi Tavadia, Adv. in W.P. No. 1425 of 2002;K.K. Singhvi, Senior Ad

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. These two writ petitions involve common issue as to whether parties before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (for short 'Consumer Forum') and Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, 'State Commission') are entitled to...

Farooq K. Khan @ Farooq Chikna @ Farooq Ibrahim Khan @ Sunilkumar Maha ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The appellant was prosecuted on the allegation of having committed offences punishable under section 392 of the IPC read with section 397 of the IPC, and the offence punishable under section 135 of the Bombay...

Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma and Etc. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act, 1999 - Sections 3, 4 and 24

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3743

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Manohar and ;S.R. Chitnis, Sr. Advs., ;Usha Dhanukar, ;Anikla Kaushik, ;Mohan Jayakar, ;Samsher Garud and ;Sukesh Shah, Advs. in Cri W.P. No. 3 and 170/2004;Nitin V. Pradhan, ;S.D. Khot and ;Mohe

V.G. Palshikar, J.1. These three petitions raise identical questions of law and therefore by consent of parties, are heard together and will be decided together by this common order.2. Criminal Writ Petition No. 3 of 2004...

Raptakos Brett and Co. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under the Indian Co ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 12(5)

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR538

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Rele, Senior Counsel and ;Piyush Shah, Adv.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard the learned advocates for the parties. Perused the records.2. The petitioners challenge the Award Part-I passed by the Labour Court at Thane in Reference No. 81 of 1985 on 11th May 1994...

Umashankar D. Shukla Vs. New Shakti Dye Works Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 42(4), 78 and 79

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR772; 2002(5)BomCR772; [2002(94)FLR367]

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Jadhav, Adv.

R.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment and order of the Industrial Court, Maharashtra in appeal filed by the respondent company against the order of the Labour Court at Thane directing the respondent...

Kothari Optical Industries Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 3(3)

Reported in : 1993LC46(Bombay); 1993(68)ELT47(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri P.A. Sawant, Adv., i/b., ;M/s Gagrat & Co.

Pendse, J.1. Shri Sawant, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, very fairly stated that two out of the three questions arising in this petition stand concluded by decision of Division Bench of this Court...

Vijay Kumar Bhatia (Huf) Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act

Reported in : 1997(91)ELT574(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri P.A. Sawant, Adv., i/b., ;Gagrat & Co.

P.S. Patankar, J.1. The Petitioners imported cloves from Columbo, Ceylon in March, 1983 and filed Bs/E. It is the case of the petitioners that cloves are covered by Chapter 9 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975...