Advanced Search Results
Quality Exports and Chemicals Through Its Partner Shri Rajiv Kumar Vs. ...
Allahabad
May-17-2001
Excise
2001(75)ECC505
Shri. A.P. Mathur
ORDERP.K. Jain, J.1. The petitioners are partnership concern engaged in manufacturing of menthol and DMO and are registered with the Central Excise Department for the same. On 12.7.95 the Central Excise Officer inspected the premises of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskQuality Exports and Chemicals Vs. Cegat
Allahabad
May-17-2000
Excise
Central Excise Act - Sections 35C(2) and 209A; Central Excise Rules - Rule 209A
2001(73)ECC665; 2000LC564(Allahabad); 2000(122)ELT361(All)
A.P. Mathur, Adv.
ORDERP.K. Jain, J.The petitioners are partnership concern engaged in manufacturing of menthol and DMO and are registered with the Central Excise Department for the same. On 12.07.1995 the Central Excise Officers inspected the premises of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArun Dev Builders Vs. Shiv Raj Kumar
Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Jan-13-2014
Land Acquisition
Shri. Mukul Kumar
SALMA NOOR, MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the OP of the case No.336/2011 is directed against the order dated 18.1.2013 of the CDRF-IV, Nand Nagar, Delhi whereby the complaint of the respondent was allowed and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mukul Kumar Gupta Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-14-1999
Excise
(1999)(112)ELT84TriDel
1. These are five appeals filed by the appellants against the Order-in-Original passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut.The Commissioner had directed confiscation of the goods valued at Rs. 99,39,334/- seized from the appellants by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›