Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shri mandpe · Page 1 of about 6 results (0.020 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 06 2009

Dnyaneshwar Sopanrao Bhandare Vs. State of Maharashtra Through the Sec ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-06-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Nagpur City Corporation Act, 1948 - Sections 46, 50(1), 53(2), 53(5), 59 and 387(3); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 56; Maharashtra Civil Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979 - Rules 5, 6, 7, 7(2), 8, 8(23) and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 169; Bombay Civil Services Rules, 1959; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR152

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Chandurkar, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Writ Petition is to be disposed of finally at the stage of admission itself as per orders dated 12th June 2008. Accordingly, we have heard Shri Chandurkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 2015

Sunil Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-28-2015

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Mandpe

Oral Judgment: 1. Exception is taken to the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No. 130 of 2012 Dt.29-4-2014 by which the appellant is convicted for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2006

Mahindra and Mahindra Employees' Union and Ors. Vs. Commissioner of La ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-07-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 28, 28A, 28(3), 28(4) and 34(6); Bombay Industrial Relations Rules, 1947 - Rules 41, 43, 43(1), 43(2), 243(1) and 243(2)

Reported in : (2007)IILLJ858Bom

Advocate for Appellant : S.D. Thakur, Adv.

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Rule Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of Shri Thakur, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Shri Mandpe, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, Shri Puranik, learned Counsel for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 18 2013

Ravindra Dnyaneshwar Patil and Another Vs. the Secretary, Ministry of ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jun-18-2013

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (B.R. Gavai, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioners have invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2004

Omprakash Shrawan Deshpande and anr. Vs. Presiding Officer, School Tri ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-08-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Employees of Primary Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 - Sections 11 and 11(2); Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Maharashtra Employees of Primary Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rule 35(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(3)ALLMR759; 2005(2)BomCR537

Advocate for Appellant : A.Z.,; N.M. Jibhkate and ;S.B. Suryawanshi, Advs.

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. Heard Shri Jibhkate, Advocate for the petitioners. Shri Mandpe, A.G.P. for respondents No. 1 and 4 and Shri Samarth, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.2. Both these writ petitions arise out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2008

Vithal Ziblaji Sonone Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Police Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-15-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 113A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 306 and 498A

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR434

Advocate for Appellant : A.S. Manohar, Adv.

K.J. Rohee, J.1. The appellant has challenged his conviction for the offences punishable under Section 498A and 306 of IPC and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and fine of Rs. 500/-for the former offence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial