Advanced Search Results

Krishnan and Another Vs. Krishnaveni and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 173, 202, 307, 386, 389, 391, 397, 401, 435, 482 and 483; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 11, 406, 420 and 500

Reported in : AIR1997SC987; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)571; 1997(1)ALT(Cri)560; 1997CriLJ1519; 1997(1)Crimes97(SC); JT1997(1)SC657; 1997(1)MPLJ290; 1997(II)OLR(SC)95; RLW1997(2)SC241; 1997(1)SCALE45; (1997) 4 SCC 241

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Krishnamurthy

ORDERK. Ramaswamy, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment dated 26th March, 1992 passed by the Madras High Court in Crl. O.P. No. 10678 of 1991. The facts relevant for our...

State of Punjab and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Perfect Synthetics Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Punjab General Sales Tax Rules, 1949 - Rules 29 and 55A; Punjab General Sales Tax (Deferment and Exemption) Rules, 1991 - Rules 4, 4A, 5, 9, 9(1), 9(2) and 9(3); Rajasthan Sales Tax Rules, 1955 - Rule 29(2); Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 4, 5(1), 5(1A), 5(2), 5(3), 6 and 30A; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 5(1) and 5(3); Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 14 and 15

Reported in : JT2008(3)SC579; 2008(3)SCALE519; (2008)3SCC702; (2008)13VST550(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Mahabir Singh,; S. Ganesh and; Dalip Singh Brar, Sr. Advs

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. This civil appeal filed by the State of Punjab is directed against judgment and order dated 4.7.06 passed by Punjab and Haryana High Court in CWP No.2271 of 2006 by which it has...

P.H. Dayanand Vs. S. Venugopal Naidu and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Specific Relief Act - Sections 9

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC713(SC); [2009(1)JCR107(SC)]; 2009(4)MhLJ334(SC); (2009)2SCC323:2009(1)LHSC340

Advocate for Appellant : L. Nageshwar Rao, Sr. Adv.,; Raghavendra S. Srivastava and;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the Courts below were correct in decreeing the suit only on the premise that defendant No. 2-appellant...

M.C. Jena Vs. the Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 61; Evidence Act; Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 29A, 31 and 34; Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972 - Rules 19(3) and 38; Service Regulations - Regulation 113; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226

Reported in : 2008(1)ALD317; 2008(1)ALT733

Advocate for Appellant : Krishnamurthy Devarakonda, Adv.

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, C.J.1. Whether the punishment of removal from service imposed on the petitioner, who was then holding the post of Head Constable/Driver in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) and was found guilty of not...

Union of India (Uoi) Through South Eastern Railway and anr. Vs. Rajast ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 56, 57, 101, 102, 103, 104 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 73, 74(1), 74(2), 74(3) and 76F; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR1968AP327

Advocate for Appellant : Krishna Murthy, Standing Counsel for Railways

ORDER1. Rajasthan Supplying Agencies, represented by its proprietors, Madanlal Sodhani, as sole plaintiff, filed S.C. No. 1236 of 1962 in the Court of the learned District Munsif at Vijayawada for Rs. 136.54 nP. against the Union...

international Computers Indian Vs. Collr. of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1990)(26)ECC83

1. These appeals arise out of a common order dated 30-11-1977 passed by the Special Adjudicator in the Office of the Collector of Customs, Bombay. Facts in brief are that the head-office and factory premises of...

State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Antony Fernandez and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 -- Sections 4(1), 5A, 6 and 17(4)

Reported in : AIR1998SC2040; JT1998(1)SC729; RLW1998(2)SC179; 1998(1)SCALE605; (1998)3SCC556; [1998]1SCR865

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties finally in this appeal. A short question in this appeal that arises for consideration is as to whether the High Court in the impugned judgment...

Shiv Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Service

1. All the three OAs filed by the same applicant are being disposed of by this common order.2. The reliefs sought for by the applicant in these OAs are as follows - In OA No. 2221/...

M/S. Kothari Industrial Corp. Ltd. Vs. Tamilnadu Electricity Board and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Krishnamurthi Swami

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9748 OF2003M/s. Kothari Industrial Corporation Ltd. Appellant (s) VERSUS Tamil Nadu Electricity Board & Anr. Respondent (s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.9749 OF2003CIVIL APPEAL NO.9750...

M. Lawrence and Others Vs. Union of India Represented by General Manag ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: M. Ramaswamy Pillai, Advocate. For the Respondents: K.M. Anthru, Advocate.

Hon'ble Mr.George Paracken, Judicial Member This joint application has been filed by three retrenched casual labourers of Southern Railway. They claimed that they are entitled to be considered for the regular absorption having regard to their...