Advanced Search Results
Ramesh Chandra Tiwari and ors. Vs. Shyam Bihari and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-22-2013
Land Acquisition
Shri. Khatri
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR (SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon) WRIT PETITION No.6583 OF 200.Ramesh Chandra Tiwari and another Petitioners versus Shyam Bihari and others Respondents Present : ................................................................................................ Shri Amit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShera Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Aug-26-1993
Criminal
1994(1)WLC220; 1993WLN(UC)396
Shri. Khatri
Rajendra Saxena, J.1. Heard.2. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the order dated 8.7.1992 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ratangarh in Criminal Revision petition No. 55/92(18/89), whereby he dismissed petitioner's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Chandra Mouli Etc. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Guwahati
May-19-1980
Criminal
B.L. Hansaria, J.1.The Petitioners in these two cases have approached this Court to quash general Court Martial proceedings against them and to order for their release. As the;points of law involved are same, common arguments were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
T.U. Khatri, Residing at 2/5 Yeshwant Nagar, Goregaon (West) Bombay-40 ...
Mumbai
Mar-05-2002
Constitution
Company Secretaries Act, 1980 - Sections 2(2), 2(45A), 3(1), 6, 9, 15, 24(1), 28(2), 39, 39(1), 39(3), 145 and 217; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 383A and 383A(1); Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1965; Advocates Act, 1961; Company Secretaries Regulations, 1982; Company Secretaries Regulations, 1981
AIR2002Bom268; 2002(3)ALLMR27; 2002(4)BomCR733; (2002)3BOMLR847
Petitioner in person
R.M. Lodha, J.1 .Whether there is anything wrong in thedecision dated 24th April, 1990 taken by theInstitute of Company Secretaries of India not toallow the Advocates to practise as CompanySecretaries is the principal question in these...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT.U. Khatri Vs. Institute of Company Secretaries of India
Mumbai
Mar-05-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]122TAXMAN532(Bom)
G.V. Aiman, for the Respondent
R.M. Lodha, J.Whether there is anything wrong in the decision dated 24-4-1990 taken by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the Institute') not to allow the advocates to practise as company...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeep Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan
Jul-03-1995
Narcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20, 41 to 44, 50 and 57; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313
1996CriLJ54; 1996(1)WLC572
G.L. Khatri, Adv.
Rajendra Saxena, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment dated 16-7-94 passed by the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S. Act Cases cum Addl. Sessions Judge, Ratangarh, whereby he convicted the appellant for the offence under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBeni Dan Vs. Laxmichand and anr.
Rajasthan
Jul-03-1995
Criminal
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 192, 194 and 207; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 64; Sale of Goods Act; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 107, 116(3), 451, 452, 452(1) and 482
1996CriLJ1191; 1996WLC(Raj)UC479
L.D. Khatri, Adv.
ORDERRajendra Saxena, J.1. This petition filed under Section 482, Cr. P. C. has been directed against the judgment dated 18-1-1995 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer, whereby he allowed the appeal filed by non-petitioner Laxmi...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSukhbir Singh Kemwal Vs. Gnct of Delhi and ors
Delhi
Oct-29-2014
Land Acquisition
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. h October, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3316/2010 & Crl. M.A. 469/2011 and CM. No.2393/2011 SUKHBIR SINGH KEMWAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Bombay City-i Vs. N.U.C. Private Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-21-1980
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80HH, 104 and 109
[1980]126ITR377(Bom); [1980]4TAXMAN436(Bom)
Sawant, J.1. This is a reference by the Tribunal under s. 256(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The short question that falls for our consideration is :'Whether the assessee-company is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Rajasthan Vs. Mahesha and ors.
Rajasthan
Sep-13-2000
Property
2001(1)WLC432; 2001(1)WLN527
B.J. Shethna, J.1. The original petitioners migrated from Pakistan in the year 1965 being refugee. Initially they were granted permission for temporary cultivation of land in question. The same was extended from time to time upto...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »