Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shri kasturi · Page 1 of about 45 results (0.064 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 01 2006

Ashoka Smokeless Coal Ind. P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-01-2006

Subject : CommercialConstitution

Acts : Defence of India Rules; Colliery Control Order, 1945; Colliery Control Rules; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(2), 22 and 29; Coking Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1972; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 4A and 9(3); Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act; Colliery Control (Amendment) Order, 2000; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 19, 19(1), 37, 39, 43, 77 and 298; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Kerala Industrial Establishments (National and Festival Holidays) (Amendment) Act, 1990; Coal Mines (Nationalisation) (Amendment) Act, 1976; CVC Act, 2003 - Sections 8(1); Industrial (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Sales Tax Rules - Rule 28A; Uttar Pr

Reported in : 2007(1)CTLJ1(SC); JT2007(1)SC125; 2006(13)SCALE102; (2007)2SCC640; 2007(2)KCCRSN91; (2007) 13 SCC154

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium, A.S.G.,; A. Sharan, A.S.G.,; A.K. Ganguli

S.B. Sinha, J.Introduction:1. Leave granted in all the special leave petitions.2. The validity and/or legality of a scheme framed by the Coal India Limited for sale of coal by Electronic Auction (E-Auction) is in question in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2011

Sri.V.Shivaprasad Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-09-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : The Town Planning Act 1939 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 35; The Municipality Act - Sections 51(4), 22(1)(b), 30; Constitution of India - Article 14, 19, 21, 243; Municipal Corporations Act - Sections 3(9), 3(7)

Reported in : ILR2011(1)Ker697

Advocate for Appellant : SRI.ANIL THOMAS, Adv.

1. Important questions concerning the interpretation of Part IX-A of theConstitution of India, the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 and the TownPlanning Act,1939 arise in these two writ petitions. Since commonquestions arise, they have been heard together...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2006

Suresh Babu Vs. Asst. Superintendent of Police

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-12-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 39; Kerala Headload Workers Act, 1978; Kerala Motor Transport Workers' Welfare Fund Act, 1985; Kerala Head Load Workers Rules - Rule 26A; Constitution of India - Article 254, 254(1) and 254(2)

Reported in : 2006(1)KLT647; (2006)IIILLJ377Ker

Advocate for Appellant : V. Santharam,; Shija Sheridan and; Anto Thomas, Advs

J.B. Koshy, J.1. Petitioner is running a parcel service business. The activities of the petitioner's are mentioned in para 3 of the Writ Petition which is as follows:-The parcel service business is one where the goods...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 04 2009

Smt. Kalavathi S. Nergi Vs. the District Commissioner, District Caste ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-04-2009

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Representation of Peoples Act, 1951; Constitution of India - Articles 15(4) and 16(4); Karnataka Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Reservation of Appointments) Rules, 1992

Advocate for Appellant : K. Kasturi, Sr. Counsel for Kasturi Associates in Writ Appeal No. 392 of 2009 and ;Ramdas, Sr. Adv. in Writ Appeal No. 2050 of 2008

Anand Byrareddy, J.1. Heard the Counsel for the parties.2. The facts leading up to these appeals are as follows:Banajiga Naidu by birth. She married one Shankar Nergi, in the year 1977, who belonged to the Adi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2014

Shri Kasturi Lal Mehra Vs. M/S Narshi Pharmaceutical and Surgical (P) ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-17-2014

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: February 17, 2014 + CM(M) 1070/2013 & CM No.15803/2013 SHRI KASTURI LAL MEHRA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Mr.Ishaan Chhaya,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 2007

Smt. Shabana Mohammed Hanif Sorathia Vs. Shri Siddhique Mohammed Khan ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-18-2007

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Competent Authority Rent Act - Sections 14A, 25A, 25B and 25C; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act - Sections 31A to 31J; Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 - Sections 14A, 14(1), 19, 22, 22(1) and 39; The Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 43; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 9; Delhi Rent Act - Sections 14A and 25A; Bombay Rent Act; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2008(1)ALLMR893; 2008(2)BomCR55; 2008(3)MhLj794

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Kapse, Adv.

J.H. Bhatia, J.1. The deceased respondent No. 1 was the original applicant and was landlord of the suit premises. The present respondents are the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No. 1. The respondent No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1994

Agro Impex Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Feb-08-1994

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1995)LC338Tri(Chennai)

1. COD petitions. Originally appellants M/s. Agro Impex have filed only one appeal against the impugned order of the Collector of Customs, Madras and as directed by the Bench they have filed separate appeals for each...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1995

Amco Batteries Vs. S. Rammohan

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-23-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 33C and 36(3)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Kasturi

1. The defendant has filed this appeal challenging the interlocutory order of injunction granted by the civil court restraining the defendant from proceeding with a domestic enquiry. Shorn of details the bare facts are as follows...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2004

Surjit Singh Vs. Kasturi Lal

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on : Sep-16-2004

Subject : Land Acquisition

K.K. Srivastava, President: 1. Feeling dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 2.7.2004 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh (for short hereinafter to be referred as District Forum) vide which Complaint Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2018

Shri Arun Kumar Manocha vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-19-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Abhishek Paruthi

$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 81/2013 SHRI ARUN KUMAR MANOCHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Paruthi, Advocate Versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rupesh Sharma,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial