Advanced Search Results
M/S Sunrise Impex Panipet Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jun-22-2001
Customs
Shri. Jayachandran
1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee Sunrise Impex with reference to the impugned Order passed by the Commissioner (Customs) Appeals as per Order No. C.30/20/96-Ap-Cus.2. Shri Jayachandran appearing for the appellant submits that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaro Marketing Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Trichy
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-29-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(141)ELT747Tri(Chennai)
1. The stay applications arise from the Order-in-Original No. 28/2001, dated 11-5-2001 passed by Commissioner of Customs, Trichy by which he has ordered for confiscation of 12 numbers of second hand printing machinery valued at Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs and Central Vs. Ms. Bakelite Hylam Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jul-25-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)(77)ECC529
1. This is a Revenue appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 69/97 (H) CE dated 12.3.97 holding that the copper clad laminates is classifiable under sub-heading 7410.21 and the Revenue's claim for reclassification under SH 8546.00 has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Thakurdas Sons Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-29-2002
Land Acquisition
(2002)(144)ELT139Tri(Chennai)
1. The party's appeals and the Revenue appeal arise out of the common Order-in-Original No. S.59/254/93 Gr. 7, dated 31-1-1996 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai. The Commissioner, in the impugned order, ordered for increasing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTamil Nadu Jai Bharath Mills Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. and C. Ex. (A), Tri ...
Chennai
Feb-13-1997
Excise
1997(57)ECC217; 1998(99)ELT213(Mad)
Shri K. Alagiriswamy, ;Sr. Adv. for M/s. S. Navaneetha Krishnan and ;S. Kaderkarai, Adv.
K. A. Swami, C.J. 1. At the stage of admission, Shri Jayachandran, learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel for the Central Excise Department has taken notice for the respondents. As the appeal lies in a narrow...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNagalakshmi Flour Mills Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Aug-24-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)(99)LC314Tri(Chennai)
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. M. Cus 1361/96 dated 19.8.1996 by which the importer's claim on the imported "bran cutting machine" seeking claim of the benefit of the notification No. CN49/95 was rejected by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Nagalakshmi Flour Mills, Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Aug-31-2001
Land Acquisition
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-appeal No.M.Cus 1361/96 dated 19.8.96 by which the importer's claim on the imported "bran cutting machine" seeking claim of the benefit of the notification No.CN49/95 was rejected by both the authorities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV. Solomon Jeyapandian and ors. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Dec-21-2001
MRTP
(2002)(102)LC86Tri(Chennai)
1. In these batch of appeals, com mon question of law and facts are involved. Hence they are taken up to gether for disposal as per law.2. In these appeals, appellants had imported second-hand machin ery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArun Vyapar Udyog Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-05-2002
Miscellaneous
(2002)(82)ECC367
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appal No. 12/99(M-II) dt. 22.1.99 by which the Commissioner(Appeals) upheld the charge of shortage of 119.890 M.Ts. of scrap on which Modvat credit on duty had been taken.Further he has confirmed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Sheet Metal Industries
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Aug-14-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)(154)ELT476Tri(Chennai)
1. The Revenue is aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal No. 267/94, dt.21-7-94 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the order-in-original by which the Assistant Commissioner denied the benefit of Notification No. 58/86, dt. 10-2-1986 solely...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »