Advanced Search Results

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Shri Vasant B. Araj

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR744

Advocate for Appellant : G.S. Hegde and ;C.M. Lokesh, Advs.

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Being aggrieved by the Award passed by the IVth Labour Court at Thane on 9-10-2006 in Reference(IDA)No. 110/1999, the Petitioner Corporation has approached this Court. By the said Award the reference has been...

Smt. Laxmi Wd/O Vithoba Shinde and ors. Vs. Kamalesh Chandrasenrao Pan ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1993)95BOMLR783

Bhimrao N. Naik, J.1. This petition is filed by a vegetable vendor is in occupation of a wooden stall of her husband, Vithoba Shinde, who was admittedly the tenant of this stall.2. The few facts which...

Kalicharan Mansaram @ Maniram Snaziand and ors. Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 391 and 443; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9 and 27; Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - Sections 4 and 5

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR540

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Bhonsale, Adv. in Cr. Appeal No. 940 of 1984

M.S. Jamdar, J.1. The appellants in Cr. Appeal No. 940 of 1984 (who are hereinafter referred to as the accused) were charged and tried for offences under sections 400, 402, 120-B, 457, 458 read with 120-B,...

Baburao and Etc. Vs. the Collector, District Parbhani and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - Sections 55; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maharashtra Municipalities (Conduct of Business) Rules, 1966 - Rule 34; Maharashtra Municipalities (Elections to Subjects Committees) Rules, 1966 - Rule 38; Maharashtra Municipalities (President Election) Rules, 1981- Rules 6 and 7; Municipal Councils (Co-option of Councillors) Rules, 1967 - Rule 7(4); Bombay Village Panchayat (Sarpanch and Upsarpanch) Election Rules, 1964

Reported in : AIR1997Bom49; (1996)98BOMLR567

Advocate for Appellant : H.T. Joshi, Adv.

ORDERChapalgaonkar, J.1. These writ petitions challenge proceedings of a special meeting of Parbhani Municipal Council held on 6-11-1995. The special meeting was called to consider vote of no confidence against President of the Council. 2. Shri...

Anwar Altaf Husan Kazi Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalMotor Vehicles

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 279 and 304A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 89

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR587

Advocate for Appellant : A.H. Jadhav, Adv.

S.W. Puranik, J.1. Conviction has been recorded against the appellant for the offences under sections 279 and 304-A of the India Penal Code and he is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for four months on each...

Sudhakar Bhaskar Pore Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR482

Advocate for Appellant : L.R. Chari, ;R.B. Amrolia and ;Y.N. Katpitia, Advs.

D.J. Moharir, J.1. The appellant Sudhakar Bhaskar Pore the Head Constable in the Police Department of the State of Maharashtra was charged and tried for and convicted for committing an offence under section 161 of the...

Bapurao S/O Nanu Vs. Bapurao S/O Maruti Andha and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 98A; Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR72

Advocate for Appellant : R.G. Bhadekar, Adv. in W.P. No. 43/86, ;D.N. Patki, Adv. in W.P.No. 432/86

N.P. Chapalgaonkar, J. 1. Both these writ petitions raise a common question of law and, therefore, are being disposed of by this common judgment. Father of the present respondent No. 1 namely; Maruti s/o. Malloji (in...

Dattatraya Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : M. A. CHINNASAMY __ AADITYA ANIRUDDHA PANDE

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA2024INSC167CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.666/2012 DATTATRAYA APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT(S) ORDER This appeal arises out of the final judgment and order dated 23.11.2010 passed by...

Prof. Manohar Dhonde and Indian Bahujan Teachers Association (ibta), M ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 41D and 41D(1); Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994; M.E.P.S. (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 23, 28(5), 31, 33, 36, 37 and 143; Maharashtra State Commission for Women Act, 1993 - Sections 6, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 10, 10(1) and 13; Evidence Act - Sections 132; Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993; Representation of People Act - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 17, 19(1), 21, 23, 24, 31(1), 32, 173 and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 354 376, 504, 506 and 509; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 202 and 357; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Secti

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR717; 2007(1)BomCR417

Advocate for Appellant : B.L.Sagar Killarikar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 282 of 2004 and ;B.L.Sagar Killarikar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 4170 of 2004

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. The two Writ Petitions are pertaining to a common subject, which can be described as 'grievance relating to sexual harassment meted out to some lady teachers working in a private school.' Writ Petition...

Bappasaheb Bhanudasrao Jadhav and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 3; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 91; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 83 and 91; Sugarcane Control Order, 1966

Reported in : AIR2001Bom273; 2001(4)ALLMR440

Advocate for Appellant : Party in person and ;A.B. Bajpai, Adv. for Petioners 2 and 3

Barde, J. 1. The petitioners are agriculturists who cultivate sugarcane crops on their land situated at Navgaon Tq. Paithan Dist. Aurangabad. They are the sugarcane grower members of the respondent No. 4 --Co-operative Sugar Factory and...