Advanced Search Results

Mohammed Yusuf Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 111 and 135; Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1986(1)BomCR187; 1989(24)ECC23; 1989(24)LC718(Bombay); 1989(40)ELT14(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Gurusahani

1. This petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for quashing the investigation started by the Preventive section of the Customs Department against...

Gufic Laboratories and Three Others Vs. Union of India and Three Other ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 36(2)

Reported in : 1989(23)LC473(Bombay); 1984(17)ELT27(Bom); [1983]140ITR158a(Bom)

1. The petitioners are the manufacturers of patent and proprietary medicines falling under Tariff Item 14-E. The petitioners intended to manufacture 'Analgin Injections' and on December 16, 1975 got the label approved as being a pharmacopoeial...

Smt. Sugarbai Mohamad Siddiq and ors. Vs. Ramesh Sundar Hankare Deceas ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12(3) and 13(1)

Reported in : 1997(3)ALLMR44; 1997(2)BomCR620

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Dhorde and ;C.F. Deshmukh, Advs.

R.G. Deshpande, J.1. These two writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment, as they arise out of the judgment and decree, passed by the Extra Assistant Judge, Ahmednagar, in Regular Civil Appeal No....

Bennett, Coleman and Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25O and 25R

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ140Bom

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok H. Desai and ;F.D. Damania and ;S.S. Kapadia, Advs., i/b., Kanga and Co.

Pendse, J. 1. Both these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be conveniently disposed of by a common judgment as the disputes involved in both the petitions arise out of the...

Ramchandra Vishnu Tendulkar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribe (Regulation) Act, 1969 - Sections 2 and 4; Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribe (Regulation) (Amendment) Act, 1991 - Sections 4(2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 46 and 254(2)

Reported in : 1993(1)BomCR7

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Apte, Aspi Chinoi, K.N. Kore and ;S.P. Kanuga, Advs.

M.L. Pendse, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Sale of Trees by Occupants belonging to Scheduled Tribes (Regulation) (Amendment) Act,...

Pratapsingh Mohansingh Pardeshi (Deceased) Through Legal Representativ ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11, 12(3) and 23

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR188; (1993)95BOMLR847

Advocate for Appellant : R.G. Karmarkar, Adv.

N.P. Chapalgaonker, J. 1. Shantabai Mohansingh Pardeshi, landlady, filed a suit bearing number 461/1974 in the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Ahmednagar, against Laxmikant and Vasudeo, sons of Ravachand Bhojwani, for the eviction of defendants -...

KishIn Shewaram Loungani Vs. R. C. Ghosalkar (inspector of Customs) an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Gold (Control) Act, 1968

Reported in : [1991]72CompCas388(Bom); 1989(24)ECC12; 1989(20)LC408(Bombay); 1989(41)ELT47(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. H. E. Mooman

V.S. Kotwaj, J.1. Heard Shri. N.H. Gurusahani with Shri. S. H. Gurusahani, Shri A. A. Irani and Dr. Ashok Bathija as also A.K. Desai and Shri H. E. Mooman, learned counsel for the petitioners is all...

Video Master and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Media and CommunicationCivil

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 5B, 6A, 7, 7(1) and 8(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR1986Bom428; 1986(3)BomCR68; (1986)88BOMLR525; 1986MhLJ794

Advocate for Appellant : O.B. Chinoy, ;S.P. Kanuga, ;N.H. Gurusahani and ;S.H. Gurusahani, Advs.;J.M. Baphna, ;Madhubala Sharma and ;R.H. Akrani, Advs. ;W.N. Yande, Addl. Govt. Pleader

Dharmadhikari, J.1. As both these writ petitions involve common questions of law and fact, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The petitioners in Writ petition No. 5004 of 1984...

Hasmukh Balubhai Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115, 123, 124, 125, 126 and 214; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409 and 477B; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 173;

Reported in : 1985(2)BomCR469

Advocate for Appellant : N.H. Gurusahani and ;D.S. Mane, Advs.

V.S. Kotwal, J.1. The whole foundation of ventilating the grievance by the petitioner claiming privilege for not being examined as prosecution witness in a criminal case is obviously misconceived having regard to the facts and circumstances...

Tulshiram Bhumayya Shriram and ors. Vs. Akbarkhan Mujafarkhan and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 11(3), 12(3) and 13(1)

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR279; 2004(2)BomCR389

Advocate for Appellant : D.A. Gursahani, Adv.

Marlapalle B.H., J.1. This letters patent appeal arises from an order summarily rejecting Writ Petition No. 1545/1994, by the learned Single Judge. We proceed to state the undisputed facts germane for the present purpose.2. Appellants are...