Advanced Search Results

Rajasthan Bar Council Vs. Nathuram and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952, Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1956Raj179; 1956CriLJ1350

Advocate for Appellant : Chandmal, Secretary and;Kansingh Dy. Government Adv.

Modi J. 1. This is a contempt of Court matter set in motion by the Secretary, Rajasthan Bar Council, against two Sub-Inspectors of Police Nathuram and Harnamsingh in relation to the arrest of Shri Fateh Chand...

Lrs. of Ganga Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2001(2)WLC223; 2007(2)WLN10

B.J. Shethna, J.1. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Khatri, one of the standing counsel of the respondent Department, is directed to accept notice for the respondent Department. Mr. Goyal to supply copy of the writ...

Kamal Kishore Goyal Vs. Union Co-operative Insurance Society Ltd. and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN729

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Mridul

P.N. Shinghal, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge dated October 12, 1971, by which he has quashed the award (Ex-10) of the Regional Labour Commissioner dated July 3/4, 1969,...

Shakuntala M900675.Htm(Smt.) and anr. Vs. Hemchand M. Singhania

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12

Reported in : 1990(3)BomCR82

Advocate for Appellant : K.J. Abhyankar and ;Suresh Gole, Advs.

T.D. Sugla, J.1. The appellant were the respondents in Writ Petition No. 5391 of 1985 in this Court and defendants in the suit for eviction filed against them by the plaintiff for their eviction, the petitioner...

S.G.N. Cables Industries Private Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Incentive Code, 1978

Reported in : (1997)115PLR592

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Goyal

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J.1. This petition has been filed for quashing of the notification (Annexure P-2) whereby the Government imposed octroi on consumption, use or sale of the goods shown in that Annexure.2. The petitioner is a...

Ramji Lal Vs. Durga Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)417

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Goyal

I.S. Israni, J.1. This civil revision petition under Section 115, CPC has been filed against the order dated 28-10-1987 passed by learned Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Karauli in Civil Suit No. 62/1982.2. A suit was filed...

Dr. Sudhakar Malviya and Others Vs. Banaras Hindu University and Other ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 23 and 39; Banaras Hindu University Act, 1915 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC266; (1998)3UPLBEC1713

Advocate for Appellant : Amrish Kumar Sharma, ;V.K. Goel and ;Shiv Pati B. Pandey, Advs.

R.K. Mahajan, J.1. This writ petition raises interesting question as the petitioner's grievance is that they were though recruited as Research Assistants in different branches of the University on various dates between 1963 and 1982 as...

Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ram Babu Son of Sri Pa ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140, 166 and 166(3); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110 and 110A; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 137; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 307, 504 and 535; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules 1998 - Rules 121, 209, 210, 211 and 221; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 5, Rules 9 to 13 and 15 to 30 - Order 9 - Order 13, Rules 3 to 10 - Order 14, Rule 2 - Order 16, Rules 2 to 21 - Order 17 - Order 23, Rules 1 to 3

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC137; 2007ACJ1406; 2006(3)AWC2803

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Goyal and ;Manish Goyal, Advs.

Prakash Krishna, J.1. Common questions of law and facts are involved in all these revisions and they were heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment. All these revisions arise out of similar...

international Publishers Vs. Union Territory and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Acts : Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 4(1) and 8A; Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Buildings) Rules, 1960 - Rules 5, 6, 6A, 9 and 9(2); Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) (Service of Notice) Rules, 1974 - Rule 1; Chandigarh Leasehold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973 - Rule 1

Reported in : AIR2000P& H260; (2000)126PLR579

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Batta, Sr. Adv. and; Sanjay Tangri, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether a tenant of a building constructed on the site sold by the Chandigarh Administration under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 (for short, the Act) read with the Chandigarh...

Kissan Trading Company Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 39 and 39(1); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5(3) and 15;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 39 and 39(1); Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5(3) and 15

Reported in : [2001]124STC4(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : K.L. Goyal and; ; P.C. Garg,

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This is a petition for quashing of the notice, annexure P1, issued by the Excise and Taxation Officer-cum-Assessing Authority, Karnal (respondent No. 2) to the petitioner to show cause as to why the...