Advanced Search Results

Bahubali Vs. Collector of Central Excise and

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (1984)(16)ELT631Tri(Chennai)

1. This is an application for reference under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Tribunal in appeal No. CD.(MAS) 31/82, dated 25-6-1983. A short resume of the facts may be...

Ashok Kumar Agarwal Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1989)(22)LC61Tri(Chennai)

1. These applications arise out of a common order dated 31-8-87, passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, by which he had ordered absolute confiscation of 2,226 gms. of primary gold seized from the possession...

Wipro Info Tech Ltd. and anr. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1994)(52)LC394Tri(Chennai)

1. These applications arise out of the orders passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore. In respect of the importations made by the appellants at Bangalore, Madras and Bombay duty demanded and penal action taken...

Bifora Watch Company Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1997)LC26Tri(Delhi)

1. This appeal arises from the Order-in-Appeal dated 21-2-1991, passed by the Collector (Appeals), Bangalore. By this order, the Collector rejected the claim of benefit of Notification No. 186/86 for the purpose of Auxiliary duty. The...

Automotive Axles Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1995)(79)ELT275Tri(Chennai)

1. By this application, the applicants have pleaded for dispensation of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 4,03,603.42 demanded and a penalty of Rs. 50,000/- levied on the applicants in terms of the impugned order of the...

Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 33 and 35F; Central Excises Rules, 1944 - Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : 1991(33)ECC160; 1992(57)ELT12(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel, ;Shri S.R. Shivaprakash and ;Shri R. Narayana, Advs.

ORDER1. In W.P. No. 3113/1986 : Petitioner is M/s. Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. The petitioner has challenged the validity and legality of the original order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, bearing No....

Bhoruka Aluminium Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1993(43)ECC40; 1993LC531(Karnataka); 1993(67)ELT276(Kar); ILR1993KAR1150; 1993(2)KarLJ84

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, Adv.

K.A. Swami, Acting C.J.1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 3-2-19993 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 21339 of 1989 on the interlocutory application filed by the respondents for extension...

Gurupriya Tele Auto (P) Ltd. Vs. Supdt. of Central Excise

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 10, 11, 52, 173B, 173B(2), 173B(9), 173C, 173G(3) and 173-I ; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11A, 11A(1), 11B, 35, 35A, 35E, 35E(2) and 35EE

Reported in : 1992(37)ECC62; 1992(58)ELT361(Kar); ILR1992KAR605

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, Adv.

ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J. 1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of the goods referred by the petitioner as 'Telephone Dial' for telephone apparatus/instrument. The question raised in this Writ Petition involves the interpretation of Section 11A of...

Thungabhadra Steel Products Ltd. Vs. Supdt. of Central Excise

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3 and 11A; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56A, 57E, 57G, 57-I, 57K and 57P; Customs Act, 1944 - Sections 11A

Reported in : 1991(33)ECC140; 1992LC87(Karnataka); 1991(56)ELT340(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is a public-sector undertaking engaged in the manufacture, assembly and erection of hydraulic gates, hoists, cranes and pen-stock pipes which are eligible to levy under the Central Excise Act ('the Act'). The petitioner...

Wipro Limited Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Customs, Madras

Court : Chennai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1996(81)ELT28(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, ;Sr. Counsel for M/s. R. Raghavan

ORDER1. Petitioner has imported goods which have been described by it as computer parts and accessories. The ship arrived on 13-6-1995. The bills of entry in respect of these items were filed between 14-7-1995 and 2-8-1995....