Advanced Search Results

Shree Warana Sahakari Dudh Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (2003)(155)ELT465Tri(Mum.)bai

1. In this matter, an application has been filed for rectification of mistake under Section 35C(2) of the Cental Excise Act, which was apparent on the record to rectify the defects in the Order dated 28.4.2001...

Santogen Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central excise Act, 1944 - Sections 32E(1) and 32F; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(84)ECC74; 2002(143)ELT289(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : E.P. Bharucha, Senior Counsel and ;S.P. Bharucha, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Shri E.P. Bharucha for the petitioners and Shri A.J. Rana appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner seeks to challenge the order of the Settlement Commission, Customs and Central Excise Additional Bench, Mumbai, (the...

Cheneena Impex Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange Board ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. E P. Bharucha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Neville P. Lashkari and Mr.Joby Mathew, Advocates for Appellants. Mr. Saleh Doctor, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anant Upadhyay and Mr. Tejas Joshi, Advocate fo

Justice N.K. Sodhi, Presiding Officer This order will dispose of two Appeals no. 41 and 42 of 2007 both of which are directed against the same order dated 19.1.2007 passed by the whole time member of...

Tata Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)(53)ELT88Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The aforesaid 18 Stay Applications have been filed on behalf of the applicants covering a duty amount of Rs, 41,82,238/-which is the amount not paid and in respect of which Stay Applications have been moved.2....

Remidex Pharma Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(194)ELT228Tri(Bang.)

1. M/s Remidex Pharma (P) Ltd., Bangalore (Appellants) are manufacturers of P or P medicaments. They manufacture the goods on their own behalf as well as on behalf of others with effect from 7.2.03. The appellants...

Premji Haridas and Co. Vs. Municipal Corpn. of Greater Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 1997(89)ELT658(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri E.P. Bharucha and ;Aditya Chitale, Advs.

1. The short point which involves consideration by this Court in the present matter is whether the conversion of Castor Oil (Commercial) into Castor Oil (BP)-British Pharmacopia, is a manufacturing process which brings into existence a...

Ralliwolf Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4(1) and (4) and 11(B)

Reported in : 1992(2)BomCR262; (1992)94BOMLR91; 1992(59)ELT220(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri E.P. Bharucha,;Nimish R. Kothare and;Smt. D.S. Kunte, Advs.

Kapadia, J. 1. The question involved in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India relates to the true scope and interpretation of Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944...

Shri Krishna Petro Yarns Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR313; 1995(75)ELT753(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri E.P. Bharucha and ;Kamal Parsurampuria, Advs.

S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. This group of 36 writ petitions involves a common question as regards interpretation and scope of Section 61(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 (for brevity 'Act'). All these petitions were notified on board...

J.B. Rupani Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1996(81)ELT56(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri E.P. Bharucha, Adv., i/b., ;M/s. Narendra & Co.

Pendse, J.1. On June 9, 1978 Government of India issued Notification No. 117 of 1978 exempting specified goods from payment of customs duty if the goods are imported against advance licence. The petitioner who was carrying...

Baboobhai Patel and Company Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 28, 110 and 129A

Reported in : 1993LC424(Bombay); 1993(68)ELT734(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri E.P. Bharucha and ;Shri Jaideep Patel, Advs., i/b., ;M/s. C.R. Patel and Co.

Pendse J. 1. The petitioners imported two consignments of goods described as Diethylene Diamine Hexahydrate and sought clearance under two bills of entries against two REP licences dated August 7, 1981 and September 5, 1981. The...