Advanced Search Results
K.B. Agarwala Vs. Smt. Chandrawati and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-08-1975
PropertyCivil
Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation, Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115
AIR1976All15
Deokinandan and ;B. Dayal, Advs.
Mehrotra, J.1. This special appeal is directed against the judgment of a learned single Judge of this Court. The brief facts are these; The appellant before us, Sri K. B. Agarwala, is the landlord of premises...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Saharanpur Electric Supply Company Ltd.
Allahabad
Aug-27-1976
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43(1) and 43(6); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(5)
[1977]109ITR545(All)
Deokinandan and ;Ashok Gupta, Advs.
D.M. Chandrashekhar, J.1. At the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi Bench 'C') (shortly referred to as the Tribunal) has referred to this court the following question of law :' Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskController of Estate Duty Vs. Satish Chandra
Allahabad
Mar-18-1975
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 33(1), 34(1) and 64(1)
[1979]119ITR783(All)
Shri. Deokinandan
Mehrotra, J.1. This is a reference under Section 64(1) of the E.D. Act, 1953. The following question has been referred to us for our answer :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jagannath Prasad and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-23-1976
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 282; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 5, Rule 20
[1977]110ITR27(All)
D.C. Chaturvedi, Adv.
C.S.P. Singh, J 1. The controversy raised in this petition falls within a very narrow compass. We will set out only such facts as are necessaryfor the disposal of this application. The question that arises is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrayag Dass Agarwal Vs. Assistant Controller of Estate Duty and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-06-1972
Direct Taxation
Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 52; Estate Duty Rules, 1953 - Rule 18
[1973]91ITR160(All)
B.C. Dey, Adv.
Gulati, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution.2. One Lala Beni Madho Agarwal of Allahabad died on September 29, 1964. His estate became liable to estate duty under the Estate Duty Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeokinandan Bagaria Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Feb-08-1985
Land Acquisition
(1985)(21)ELT581Tri(Kol.)kata
1. Shri Deokinandan Bagaria, 165, Central Avenue, Calcutta-700007 had filed a revision application to the Secretary, Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi being aggrieved from Order No.264 of 1980 dt. 31st...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFirozabad Glass and Chemical Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Income-tax O ...
Allahabad
Sep-07-1967
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(12) and 127; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963 - Sections 4
[1969]72ITR775(All)
Deokinandan Agarwal, Adv.
Jagdish Sahai, J. 1. In these two writ petitions common submissions have been made. We are, therefore, disposing them of by a common judgment. The petitioners in Civil Misc. Writ No. 901 of 1967 are the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Safi Devi Vs. Mahadeo Prasad and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-04-1978
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 and 101; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 52; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 19; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 63
AIR1978All215
K.C. Saxena, Adv.
M.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This second appeal arises out of a suit which the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 filed against five defendants. Defendants Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 are respondents Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeokinandan Khetan Vs. Controller of Estate Duty.
Allahabad
Feb-06-1968
Direct Taxation
[1968]69ITR801(All)
OAK C.J. - This is a reference under section 64 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953. Chiranjilal Khetan died on June 4, 1956, leaving considerable property. He was survived by his widow, Smt. Rami Bai, and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRanjha and anr. Vs. the State
Himachal Pradesh
Jun-27-1951
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 164(3), 367(2) and 537; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 9, 114, 118 and 133; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 34
AIR1951HP75
K.C. Pandit, Adv.
Chowdhry, J.1. The learned Sessions Judge of Mahasu has by his judgment and order dated 21.4.1951 convicted Ranjha aged thirty, and Bhura, aged eighteen, under Section 302, read with Section 34, Penal Code, for having committed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›