Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Customs (import) Vs. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-07-2006
Land Acquisition
(2006)(112)ECC302
1. Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner of Customs, vide which he has vacated show cause notice issued to the respondents, Revenue has preferred the present appeal. [i] The respondents herein M/s. Tata Iron...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-iv Vs. Damnet Chemicals Pvt. Lt ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-10-2007
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 4(3), 4(4), 11A(1) and 35L
2007(121)ECC247; 2007LC247(SC); JT2007(11)SC30; 2007(11)SCALE20; (2007)7SCC490; 2007AIRSCW5858
Vikas Singh, ASG,; Nagendra Rai, Sr. Adv.,; Navin Prakash
B. Sudershan Reddy, J. 1. These appeals preferred under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') are directed against a common order dated 22.12.2004 passed by the Customs, Excise...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhilips India Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-08-1997
Excise
(1999)(80)LC719Tri(Mum.)bai
Mr. Dholakia
1. These appeals arise out of a common order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III. The appellants manufacture GLS Lamps and Bulbs falling under heading 85.39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
National Organic Chemical Indus. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-09-1998
Service Tax
(1999)(112)ELT638Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 6-6-1998 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai III. The appellant manufacture PVC resins and PVC compound falling under Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-06-1996
Excise
(1997)(89)ELT155Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These two Appeals E-667-R/95-Bom. and E/668-R/95-Bom. have been filed against the Orders-in-Appeal No. A/386/95, dated 30-8-1995 and have been heard together.2. The appellants carry on the business of manufacturing, inter alia, a wide variety of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-12-1996
Land Acquisition
(1996)(88)ELT465TriDel
Shri. D.B.Shroff
1. The appellants manufacture inter alia, printed labels from numerous base materials such as cloth, aluminium foils, plastic films and paper.The appellants filed their classification lists on 9-3-1987 and 17-3-1987 classifying the said printed labels manufactured...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskStylopack Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-25-1998
Excise
(1999)(65)ECC539
1. These applications arise out of a common order. The total duty demand is Rs. 33,39,572.88. There is a penalty of Rs. 10.00 lacs on each of the applicants firm and Rs. 20.00 lacs on applicant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFitrite Packers Vs. Collector of Cen. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-30-1999
Excise
(1999)LC105Tri(Delhi)
1. These are three appeals filed by the above appellants against the order-in-original passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay dated 31-1-1992 confirming a duty demand of Rs. 1,78,38,348 and imposing a penalty of Rs....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Organic Chemical Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
May-19-1999
Land Acquisition
(1999)(66)ECC502
This is the party's appeal against impugned order dated 6.4.1998 praying for holding that the quantity actually received in the shore tank was the quantity required to be accounted by the appellant, and the quantity alleged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCce Vs. Mazda Industrial Chemicals Pvt.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-13-1999
Excise
(2000)(88)LC850Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The respondents are manufacturers of Surface Active Agents falling under Tariff 15AA, before 1.3.1986. They manufacture Surface Active Agent Slurry from Alkyl Benzene and Sulphuric Acid and pay Central Excise duty. Such duty-paid Surface Active...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »