Advanced Search Results

Vasavadatta Cement Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC383

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Chandra Kumar

1. This appeal arises out of and is directed against the impugned order dated 27.11.2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum.2.The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of cement and clinker falling under Chapter...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board,

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2001)(133)ELT179Tri(Bang.)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Chandra Kumar

1. These are two appeals filed by the Revenue against the impugned Order-in-Appeal No 26/95 dated 30.11.95 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore.The Assistant Commissioner as per his Order has held that the above...

Cinni Foundation Vs. Raj Kumar Sah and Sons and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 28, 29, 35, 40, 45, 45(1), 45(2), 57(1), 134 and 135; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 1, Rule 11 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC320(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bansal an; Akshay Srivastava, Advs

Reva Khetrapal, J.1. By this order, it is proposed to decide IA Nos. 5726/2009 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff), 6870/2009 (under Order VII Rule 11...

Oxford Central School, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1941 WP(C).No. 11666 of 2019 PETITIONER/S:1 OXFORD CENTRAL SCHOOL, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL...

Auma (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1992)LC55Tri(Chennai)

1. By this application, the applicants have pleaded for dispensation of the pre-deposit of a duty of Rs. 6,53,058.37 (on actuators) and Rs. 1,06,162.28 (on parts of actuators) and a penalty of Rs. 75,000/- levied in...

Motor Industries Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)(65)ECC632

1. All these set of appeals arise from a common Order-in-Original No.67/97 passed by Commissioner, Central Excise, Bangalore. By this order, he has held that MICO are the real manufacturers of Fliter Inserts produced in the...

ind Auto Filters and ors. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1999)(80)LC195Tri(Bang.)alore

1. All these set of appeals arise from a common order-in-original No.67/97 passed by Commissioner, Central Excise, Bangalore. By this order, he has held that MICO are the real manufacturers of Filter Inserts produced in the...

S. Murugesan Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1989)(24)LC561Tri(Chennai)

1. The Miscellaneous application has been filed for leave to produce additional evidence regarding the claims of ownership of third parties.2. A. Nos.G/115 & 116/88 & C/331/88. - Since the above appeals arise out of the...

Bhagawandas Vs. Roasene Jerome D' Souza

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 99 and Order 1 Rule 9

Reported in : ILR1995KAR440; 1995(4)KarLJ582

Advocate for Appellant : K.I. Bhatta, Adv.

Hari Nath Tilhari, J. 1. This is the defendant's Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for short 'C.P.C.', challenging the Judgment and Decree dated June 23, 1984 delivered by 2nd Additional...

Manohar Lal Ahuja and ors. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Collection-ii and a ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 187, 222, 226 and 226(3)

Reported in : [1984]148ITR608(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Gulati, Adv.

Satish Chandra, J. 1. The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for the quashing of a notice of attachment issued by the ITO, Kanpur, on April 22, 1972, under Section 226 of the I.T....