Advanced Search Results
Advance Paints P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jan-11-2000
Service Tax
(2000)(69)ECC329
1. This is an appeal relating to reversal of the Modvat credit when an assessee who comes within the Small Scale Industries exemption under Notification No. 175/86. The issue has been succinctly put by the Commissioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEltron India Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-02-2001
Excise
(2002)(150)ELT660Tri(Mum.)bai
Shri. Biradar
1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the decision of the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II, made in Order-in-Original dated 22.10.1991. A show cause notice was issued charging the appellant that they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndia United Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Dec-17-1985
Excise
(1986)(25)ELT993Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This application under Section 35-G(1) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 is by the Respondent in Appeal No. ED 65 of 1984. By this application, the applicant requires the Tribunal to refer the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
India United Mills No. 1 Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Feb-17-1986
Excise
(1986)(8)LC565Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This application under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 is by the Respondent in, Appeal No ED 65 of J984. By this application, the applicant requires the Tribunal to refer the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSolder Industries Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Aug-30-1988
MRTP
(1989)(20)LC89Tri(Mum.)bai
Shri. Biradar
1. This appeal is directed against the order-in-original bearing No.S/10-78/83D dated 25.5.1983 passed by the Collector of Customs, Bombay.2. The subject of challenge is the order of confiscation of 138 bales Hydraulics Hose and the fine...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAdvance Paints Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jul-27-1990
Service Tax
(1991)LC459Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This appeal is directed against the order-in-Appeal bearing No.PPM-10B-I-52/86 dated 25-8-1986 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay, confirming the Order-in-Original No. V( 14) 18-87/83/2892 dated 7-6-84 rejecting part of the claim for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVardhaman Polymer Indus. and ors. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Aug-18-1999
Land Acquisition
(2000)(88)LC801Tri(Mum.)bai
1. M/s. Vardhman Polymer Industries were a small scale manufacturer making plastic moulded parts for domestic mixer. They were not licensed under the Central Excise law nor had they filed any declaration claiming the benefit of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNimesh JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Mar-24-2000
Excise
(2000)(69)ECC665
1. Vide order dated 8.10.99 despatched on 2.11.99, the present applicant was directed to deposit Rs. 50,000 as pre-condition for hearing of the appeal. In the order, the Tribunal had indicated that the recovery for the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVishal Industries, S.H. Pawar, Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Aug-13-2001
Excise
(2003)(154)ELT608Tri(Mum.)bai
1. These four applications relate to four appeals arising out of a common under. Since the issue is small the appeals are taken up for disposal after granting waiver of pre-deposit in each case as prayed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Vs. Ciens Laboratories
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-01-2001
Excise
1. The above appeal arises out of the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) who has held that modvat credit is admissible to the respondents herein on the strength of endorsed invoice (Rs. 1054/-) and on the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »