Advanced Search Results
Hindustan National Glass and Vs. Collr. of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-02-1994
Land Acquisition
(1994)(71)ELT867TriDel
Shri. B. Saha
1. The appellants herein imported a consignment described in the Bill of Entry as refractory components for glass furnace FONDAL SCW.Appellants claimed classification under sub-heading 6902.20 CTA as refractory bricks, but the Department assessed the goods...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBinani Brothers (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Feb-08-1989
MRTP
(1992)(57)ELT413Tri(Kol.)kata
1. At the outset, the Ld. J.D.R., Shri P.C. Jain raised a preliminary objection stating that the amount involved is less than Rs. 10,000.00 and it is a second appeal and therefore, initially it may be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTexmaco Limited Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-29-1996
Land Acquisition
(1997)(90)ELT463TriDel
1. This appeal arise from Order dated 29-9-1989, passed by the Collector (Appeals), Calcutta. By this order, the Collector has confirmed the lower authorities rejection of importers' claim for registration of contract under Project Import Regulations,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Bongaigaon Refinery and Vs. C.C., Calcutta
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Apr-26-2001
Land Acquisition
1. In this appeal filed by M/s Bongaigaon Refinery & Petrochemicals Ltd. the matter relates to the valuation with regard to the import of the waste recovery system based on the glycolysis of waste polyester fibre....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAbinash Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Aug-07-2001
Service Tax
1. By this appeal the appellants have challenged the impugned order on the ground that the goods manufactured were not new goods having distinct name, use and identity and since no process of manufacture was undertaken...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGouri Metal Stores Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Aug-22-2002
Service Tax
(2003)(153)ELT184Tri(Kol.)kata
1. Vide the impugned Order, the authorities below have confiscated 17 MTs. of Brass Scrap with an option to the appellants to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 1,25,000.00 (Rupees one lakh...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Sanitaryware and Vs. Collr. of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Apr-21-1994
Service Tax
(1994)(71)ELT865TriDel
Shri. B. Saha
1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against an Order-in-Appeal dated 5-7-1989 passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Calcutta.2. The appellants imported Recrystallined Silicon Carbide refractory bricks (beams) as component parts. The goods...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSteel Worth (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-05-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)(82)ELT144TriDel
1. This is an appeal filed by M/s. Steel Worth (P) Ltd. being aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal dated 6-12-1985 of the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Calcutta.2. The matter relates to the project import with regard to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan National Glass and Vs. Commissioner of Customs,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Nov-21-2001
Land Acquisition
(2002)(145)ELT162Tri(Kol.)kata
1. The appellants imported Molybdenum Electrodes valued at Rs. 1,31,101.56 and classified the same in their Bill of Entry No. 351 dated 16.9.2000 under Customs Tariff Heading 8545.11. On examination of the goods by the Customs...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskContinental Advertising Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Jul-05-2004
Service Tax
(2006)STR191
1. I have heard Shri B. Saha, Id. Advocate for the appellants and Shri J.R. Madhiam, ld. JDR for the Revenue.2. Shri Saha submits that the ST-3 Returns were submitted in time but the Returns were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »