Advanced Search Results

Tripti Dubey Vs. Nitkesh @ Gudda Raghuvanshi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Aseem Dixit

CRR No.120/2013 Criminal Revision No.120/2013 17.4.2013 Shri Aseem Dixit, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent No.5. Shri Manish Gavane, counsel for the respondent No.1 to 4. Heard on admission. The...

Dinesh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Aseem Dixit

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR SINGLE BENCH PRESENT : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. K. GUPTA CRIMINAL REVISION NO.293/2013 Dinesh Vs. State of M.P. .................................................................................................... Shri Aseem Dixit, counsel for the applicant. Shri Ajay Tamrakar,...

V.K. Brahamankar Vs. Special Police Establishment

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008(3)MPHT58

A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. The order passed in this appeal shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 2110/1997 (Smt. Vandana Brahamankar v. Special Police Establishment) and Criminal Appeal No. 2183/1997 (Shivkumar Gupta and Anr. v....

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Koushal Prasad Jaiswal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ1830; 2008(4)MPHT170

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Dubey

A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This judgment shall also govern the disposal of connected Criminal Appeal No. 138 of 2008 (Koushal Prasad Jaiswal v. The State of M.P.) filed on behalf of the accused.2. The accused has been...

Jagdish Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Cr.A.No.1397/2012 28.08.2012 Shri Aseem Dixit, Advocate for the appellants. Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Panel Lawyer for the respondent-State. Shri R.S.Patel, Advocate for the complainant Phoolrani. Heard on IA No.17782/12 and IA No.17783/12, applications relating to compromise for...

Ravi Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Aseem Dixit

Cr.R.No.1457/2012 Cr.R.No.1458/2012 5.3.2013 Shri Aseem Dixit, counsel for the applicants. Shri S.K.Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State. Dr. Rekha Jain, Inspector, Rewa the then Investigation Officer of the case is present in person in compliance of...

Harigopal Katiya Vs. Jagdish Prasad Judgement Given By: Hon'ble Shri J ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Aseem Dixit

Cr.A.No.2288/2012 Criminal Appeal No.2288/2012 6.2.2014 Shri Aseem Dixit, counsel for the appellant. Shri R.N.Yadav, Panel Lawyer for the State/ respondent No.5. Heard on admission. The appellant has preferred the present appeal under Section 372 of the...

H.R. Manhar Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2005CriLJ4759; 2005(4)MPLJ22

Advocate for Appellant : U.K. Sharma, Sr. Counsel and ;U.P. Tripathi, Adv.

ORDERA.K. Shrivastava, J.1. U.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Shri U.K. Tripathi, Advocate for the applicants.2. Shri Aseem Dixit. Govt. Advocate for the respondents.3. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, they are heard...

Vijay Kumar Bansal and anr. Vs. Vinod Kumar Rai and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(21), 2(35), 2(47), 3 and 10(2)

Reported in : II(2005)ACC611; 2006ACJ1424; 2005(1)MPHT68; 2005(1)MPLJ404

Advocate for Appellant : Aseem Dixit, Adv.

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J.1. By filing this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') the appellants driver and owner of the offending vehicle have challenged the award dated...

Lolar Prasad Shukla Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Aseem Dixit

W.P.No.7531/2013 06/05/2013 Shri Aseem Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Inter-alia contending that petitioners are owners of various land as is indicated in Para-1 of the writ petition and the land of the petitioners are being acquired...