Advanced Search Results

Shri Anant Ram Sarangal and Shri Vs. Balwant Bros. Pvt. Ltd., Shri

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Reported in : (2007)1CompLJ350

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. U.P. Mathur, Shri. Mathur

1. In this order I am considering CP No. 65/2005 filed under Sections 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 by Shri Anant Ram Sarangal and Shri Ajay Sarangal, Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 respectively alleging "oppression"...

Ambika Industries and anr. Vs. Customs, Excise Gold (Control) Appellat ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2001(75)ECC263; 2000LC450(Allahabad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.P. Mathur

ORDERR.K. Agrawal, J.1. The two petitioners in the present writ petition namely M/s. Ambika Industries, C-18, Nadarganj, Industrial Area, Amausi, Lucknow and M/s. Digambar Boundary, B-10, Industrial Area Nadarganj, Amausi, Lucknow have filed the present writ...

Bhagwandas Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 143

Reported in : 1988(35)ELT628(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.P. Mathur

K.C. Agarwal, J.1. We have heard Shri A.P. Mathur the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel appearing for the Union of India.2. In this case, the trucks of the petitioner alongwith contravened...

Sah Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ExciseCivil

Reported in : 1993(46)LC490(Allahabad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.P. Mathur

ORDER1. We have heard Shri A.P. Mathur learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sushil Hartauli learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Union of India. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 17.1.1992 passed...

Quality Exports and Chemicals Through Its Partner Shri Rajiv Kumar Vs. ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2001(75)ECC505

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.P. Mathur

ORDERP.K. Jain, J.1. The petitioners are partnership concern engaged in manufacturing of menthol and DMO and are registered with the Central Excise Department for the same. On 12.7.95 the Central Excise Officer inspected the premises of...

Rajishi Foam therm and Pack Vs. Cegat and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1996(63)LC188(Allahabad)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.P. Mathur

K.L. Sharma, J.1. Heard Shri A.P. Mathur ld. Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shishir Kumar ld. Standing Counsel for Central Excise and perused the Writ Petition.2. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

Kanoria Chemicals and Ind. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2000(68)ECC442

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.P. Mathur

ORDERR. K. Agrawal, J.1. The petitioner M/s Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Limited, has filed the present writ petition for quashing the order No. (i) 22/Demand/78 dated 8.12.1978 under C.No. V-14-A (18) 208/77/11965 dated 26.12.1978 (Annexure A....

Net Plast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. (Appeals)

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1999(66)ECC650

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. A.P. Mathur

ORDERM.C. Agarwal, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order dated 31-3-1999 passed by the Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Ghaziabad whereby in exercise of powers conferred...

Puneet Goel and ors. Vs. Three Aces Services Ltd. and ors.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Company

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. U.P. Mathur

1. In this petition filed under Sections 397/ 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act') in the matter of Three Aces Services Ltd. (the company), the only allegation relates to the illegal removal of the...

Brij Mohan Bansal Vs. Bansal Gems Pvt. Ltd., Shri

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. U.P. Mathur

1. By means of this petition filed under Section 397 and 398 of the No.Companies Act 1956 (the Act) the petitioner has alleged acts of oppression and mismanagement against the respondents and has sought appropriate reliefs.2....