Advanced Search Results
M/S. Southern Petrochemical Vs. C.C.E., Chennai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-18-2001
Customs
(2001)(76)ECC38
Shri. KR Natarajan
1. This appeal has been filed by M/s SPIC Ltd, against the order is appeal No.C3 363/96 dated 30.10196 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Chennai, on the ground that since the value of the end product...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMarvel Engineering Industries and Another Vs. Commissioner of Central ...
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Nov-04-2009
Land Acquisition
Shri G.Natarajan, Advocate. Ms.Indira Sisupal, JDR
Per Dr.Chittaranjan Satapathy Heard both sides. Shri G.Natarajan, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the appellants manufacture PD pumps as well as parts thereof. The parts used in the manufacture of PD pumps were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskT. Lakshmikumara Thathachariar Vs. the Commissioner, Hindu Religious a ...
Chennai
May-02-1997
Trusts & Societies
(1997)2MLJ642
Shivaraj Patil, J.1. Heard the learned senior counsel and Special Government Pleader for the parties.2. Following are the facts and events leading to the filing of these appeals:The appellant is one and the same in both...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
State Of Karnataka Vs. Suresha
Karnataka
Nov-17-2021
Land Acquisition
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1095 OF2016BETWEEN: State of Karnataka By...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVijayan @ Vijayakumar Vs. State Rep. by Inspector of Police
Supreme Court of India
Mar-22-1999
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 153
AIR1999SC1311; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)692; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)258; 1999CriLJ2037; 1999(2)Crimes6(SC); JT1999(2)SC322; 1999(2)SCALE164; (1999)4SCC36; [1999]2SCR89
N. Natarajan,; V. Balasubramanium and; K.K. Mani, Advs
K.T. Thomas, J.1. Out of six persons arraigned before a Sessions Court for the murder of one Natarajan, one alone was convicted and the rest were acquitted. The High Court of Madras confirmed the conviction and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLaxmi Raj Shetty and anr. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India
Apr-26-1988
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 9, 81, 78(2), 56, 212, 302, 392, 411 and 449; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 366; Evidence Act, - Sections 9, 56, 78(2) and 81
AIR1988SC1274; 1988CriLJ1783; 1988(2)Crimes107(SC); JT1988(2)SC180; 1988(1)SCALE931; (1988)3SCC319; [1988]3SCR706
N. Natarajan,; V. Krishnamurthi and; V. Balachandran,;Advs
A.P. Sen, J.1. Appellant No. 1, Laxmi Raj Shetty is under sentence of death on his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for having committed the murder of the deceased P.N. Gnanasambandam,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollr. of C. Ex. Vs. Ambur Co-operative Sugar Mills
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Dec-06-1985
Land Acquisition
(1999)(112)ELT508TriDel
1. In this case, by a notice dated 28-7-1981 under Section 36(2) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the Government of India sought to review the Order-in-Appeal No. 221/81, dated 12-2-1981 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskG. Subramanian Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Dec-16-1988
Education
(1989)(22)LC289Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal directed against the order dated 11-11-87 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras, by which he had upheld the order of the Deputy Collector of Central Excise, Trichy, dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBraithwaite and Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
May-11-1999
Excise
(2000)(116)ELT487Tri(Chennai)
1. In all these appeals common question of law and facts are involved, hence they are taken up for disposal as per law. The revenue has also filed appeals on the same issue.2. The question that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Madhu Gupta Vs. Dy Cit, Central Circle-3 Mumbai
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Feb-27-2006
Direct Taxation
(2006)8SOT691(Mum.)
The first ground of objection by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in confirming the addition on account of perquisite value of Rs. 12,30,149 being difference between written down value of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »