Advanced Search Results

Keshav Kaushik Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Haryana and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionService

Permod Kohli, J.I. General1. District Judiciary is the foundation of the judicial system upon which the whole edifice of the judicial institutions stands. Judiciary is the bulwark of the democratic system in India and reckons indubitably...

Punjab Urban Development Authority and ors. Vs. Dashmesh Educational S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 77, 166 and 177; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 - Sections 6(6); Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900 - Sections 4, 5 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 1, Rule 10; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 3(26); Transfer of Property Act, 1881 - Sections 2(6); Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20; Forest Law

Reported in : (2005)139PLR238

Advocate for Appellant : Anupam Gupta, Adv.

Surya Kant, J.1. This judgment will dispose of Regular Second Appeal Nos. 4328 and 4345 of 2002, as not only common questions of facts and law are involved in these two Appeals but both have been...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Singh Builders Syndicate

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 11(8); Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC2352(SC); JT2009(5)SC456; 2009(4)SCALE491; (2009)4SCC523:2009AIRSCW5085

Advocate for Appellant : K. Radha Krishna, Sr. Adv.,; Asha G. Nair and; D.S. Mahra

ORDERR.V. Raveendran, J.1. The appellant challenges the order of the Delhi High Court dated 27.3.2006 appointing a Retired Judge of the High Court as sole Arbitrator to decide the disputes arising in respect of a construction...

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Arvind Joshi

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008(3)MPHT424

Abhay Gohil, J.1. The State of Madhya Pradesh has filed this appeal, after obtaining leave from this Court under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., against the judgment of acquittal dated 28/12/93 in Sessions Trial No. 279/91 by...

Madan Lal, Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cbi/Acu-iii

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 407

Reported in : 2004CriLJ3707

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Bali, Sr. Adv. and; D.V. Gupta, Adv.

ORDERSurya Kant, J.1. This petition under Section 407 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the petitioner seeking transfer of the case, registered against him vide FIR No....

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. D.R. Laxmi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 6, 16, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4) and 26; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)562; JT1996(9)SC327; (1997)1MLJ116(SC); 1996(7)SCALE316; (1996)6SCC445; [1996]Supp6SCR221; 1997(1)LC445(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Aruneshwar Gupta, Adv

ORDER1. This appeal by special leave arises from the Division Bench judgment of the High Court of Rajasthan made on September 2, 1985 in W.P. No. 602/78. The admitted facts are that the notification under Section...

Ram Pukar Singh Vs. Bhimsen and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 12(1) and 23A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 116; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5; ; Rent Control Law

Reported in : 2006(2)MPHT153; 2006(1)MPLJ381

Advocate for Appellant : Amitabh Gupta, Adv.

Abhay M. Naik, J.1. Appeal is heard on the following substantial question of law :-Whether the Courts below erred in decreeing the suit for eviction under Section 12(1)(f) of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, particularly when...

Bhim Singh, Mla Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 22(2)

Reported in : AIR1986SC494; 1986CriLJ192; 1985(2)SCALE1117; (1985)4SCC677; 1986(1)LC458(SC)

O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.1. Shri Bhim Singh, a Member of the Legislative Assembly of Jammu & Kashmir, incurred the wrath of the powers that be. They were bent upon preventing him from attending the session of...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Pramod Gupta (D) by L.Rs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 8, 9, 9(1), 9(3), 10, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 18, 23(1), 25, 25(2), 28, 30, 30(3), 31, 34, 47A, 53 and 54; Punjab Minor Mineral Rules, 1934 - Rules 2, 3, 5 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 31, 31A and 142; Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 7, 11, 22, 23, 42 and 154; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rules 17 and 18- Order 41, Rules 3 and 27; ;Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 7, 11, 31, 31(2), 32, 41, 42, 42(1), 42(2), 60C, 61, 154 and 185; ;Government of India Act; ;Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1948; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; ;Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 5 to 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 18 and 20; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections

Reported in : AIR2005SC3708; 2005(4)CTC762; JT2005(8)SC203; (2005)12SCC1; MANU/SC/0549/2005

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Gupta

S.B. Sinha, J. 1.Leave granted in the special leave petitions.INTRODUCTION :2. These appeals are directed against a common judgment and order dated 5.10.2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in R.F.A....

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai Vs. Fisher Rosemount (India) Lt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 14(1); Customs Valuation Rules, 1963

Reported in : AIR2002SC96; 2001(78)ECC449; 2001(134)ELT321(SC); JT2001(9)SC446; 2001(8)SCALE89; (2002)9SCC555

Advocate for Appellant : Harish N. Salve, Solicitor General, (NP),; Jai Deep Gupta and;

Santosh Hegde, J. 1. In a dispute pertaining to determination of the valuation of goods imported by the respondent herein from M/s. Roseamount Inc. USA, the Assistant Collector of Customs, Special Valuation Bench, Bombay, held that...