Advanced Search Results

M/S Shree Mallikarjun Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Balaji Logistics Carr ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sardessai

In both these matters the parties are the same and the issues are interconnected. Therefore, both the matters are taken up and being disposed of by common judgment. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties....

Govinddas Vs. Parmeshwaridas

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Bharat Ordinance, 1949; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 6, 9, 21 and 47

Reported in : AIR1957MP71

Advocate for Appellant : Bhagwandas and ;Motilal Gupta, Advs.

ORDER1. This revision arises out of a suit filed as far back as 1941 in the Court of the City Sub-Judge, Lashkar. The suit involved a small claim of Rs. 360/-. It was at first filed,...

Tanaba Chindhuji Bhokare Vs. the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Nagpur a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2(26), 2(30), 2(32), 8, 10(1), 10(3), 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 17(1), 18, 19, 20 and 21; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 100 and 100(2); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 70

Reported in : AIR1971Bom143; (1971)73BOMLR161; ILR1971Bom384

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Khamborkar, Adv.

ORDER1. The question which arises in this petition is whether the Collector in the course of an enquiry under Section 18 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act. 1961, hereafter referred to as the...

Kashiram Shriram Doble Vs. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal at Nagpur and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tenancy Law; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 2(17), 22(31), 22(32), 29, 36, 36(1), 36(2), 36(3-A), 51, 52, 52(3), 52(4), 57, 70, 100, 100(2), 120 and 124; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 84

Reported in : AIR1970Bom366; (1970)72BOMLR838; ILR1971Bom298; 1970MhLJ462

Advocate for Appellant : J.N. Chandurkar, Adv.;G.B. Gandhe, ;R.N. Deshpande and ;G.G. Madkholkar, Advs.

Kotval, C.J. 1. This reference raises an important question as to the jurisdiction of the Collector under Section 120 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 (Bombay Act No, 99 of 1958),...

Rajaram Totaram Patel Vs. Mahipat Mahadu Patel and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 70 and 85

Reported in : AIR1967Bom408; (1967)69BOMLR282; 1967MhLJ522

Advocate for Appellant : H.R. Shah, Adv. for ;V.M. Limaye, Adv.

Kotval, C.J.(1) This revision application was referred first to a Division Bench by Mr. Justice Chandrachud and the Division Bench referred it to a Full Bench, because they found that there was some conflict between two...

MatadIn Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973, Sections 421; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 110, 147, 148, 149, 299, 302 and 324; Hindu Succession Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : 1998VAD(SC)517; AIR1999SC138; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)355; 1999CriLJ22; JT1998(5)SC264; 1998(4)SCALE370; (1998)7SCC216

ORDERD.P. Wadhwa, J.1. These two appeals have been separately filed by two appellants against common judgment dated February 11, 1997 of the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) upholding the conviction of the appellants under Section 302...

Bheru Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1453

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.S. Singhvi

Mohammad Rafiq, J.1. Under challenge in this petition is the order dated 21.1.95 whereby Asstt. Devisthan Commissioner, Bikaner directed initiation of inquiry under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959 (for short 'the Act')...

Benimadhav Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Madhya Bharat Civil Service Punishment and Appeal Rules - Rule 8; Constitution of India - Article 311(2); Madhya Bharat Revenue Administration and Ryotwari Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1957MP118

Advocate for Appellant : G.P. Patankar, Adv.

Newaskak , J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution submitted by petitioner Benimadhav s/o Brindaban Prasad of Gwalior for the issue of a writ of mandamus or certiorati against the State of...

Hubbalal and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Bharat

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1955CriLJ476

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. De

Dixit, J.1. These are five applications under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the issue of writs in the nature of 'habeas corpus' directing the release of the petitioners, who are said to be unlawfully...

Hiralal Neksi and anr. Vs. Agarchand Gorelal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 38; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108(1)

Reported in : AIR1957MP5

Advocate for Appellant : Shivdayal Shrivastava, Adv.

A.H. Khan, J.1. The facts giving rise to thin second appeal shortly stated are that the plaintiff Agar-chand and his son Kasturchand both rented a house to Hiralal and Shriram the. main defendants in this case....