Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shiv kumar · Page 1 of about 3,976 results (0.317 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 11 2004

Nutri Solvextract Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sri S.L.S. Ahmed, Sole Arbitrator and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-11-2004

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14, 17 and 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34, 114, 152 - Order 20, Rule 6, Order 47, Rule 1; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 31(7)

Reported in : I(2005)ACC857; 2004(5)ALT555; 2005(1)ARBLR141(AP); II(2005)BC505

Advocate for Appellant : P. Shiv Kumar, Adv.

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. This revision petition is filed by the plaintiff in O.S. No. 359 of 1989 on the file of the V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, aggrieved by the order in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 2004

G. Veeresham Vs. D.V. Shailendra Kumari and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-20-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 99, 101 and 103

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD521; 2004(6)ALT796

Advocate for Appellant : P. Shiv Kumar, Adv. for ;C. Kumar, Adv.

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.1. The decree holder in O.S. No. 928 of 1992 on the file of the II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, has filed this C.M.A., aggrieved by an order passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2008

Manoj Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-08-2008

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J.P. Shukla

Mridula Mishra, J.1. Both these writ applications arise out of order dated 16.3.2007 passed by the Chairman, State Transport tribunal in Transport Revision No. 37 of 2006 and 39 of 2006.2. Prayer of the petitioners in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 11 2004

Jai Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-11-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj349; 2004(4)WLC754

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Garg, Adv.

Sunil Kumar Garg, J.1. The above mentioned accused appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dtd. 3.10.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar in Sessions Case No. 43/1998 by which he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1998

Sadanandan Bhadran Vs. Madhavan Sunil Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-1998

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138 and 142; Negotiable Instruments Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973;

Reported in : 1998VIAD(SC)357; AIR1998SC3043; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)529; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)645; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)289; 1999(1)BLJR51; [1998]94CompCas812(SC); (1998)4CompLJ228(SC); 1998CriLJ4066; (1998)6SCC514

M.K. Mukherjee, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 26.02.1992 rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court in Criminal Misc. Case No. 1373 of 1991. Facts relevant for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1966

Gopi Shanker and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-21-1966

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 32 and 164; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 5, 133 and 157; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 375 and 376

Reported in : AIR1967Raj159; 1967CriLJ922

Advocate for Appellant : Bhimraj, Adv. in No. 2/66,; L.R. Kalla, Adv. in No. 3/66,;

L.N. Chhangani, J.1. These seven appeals are directed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Jodhpur, dated 23rd of December, 1965. In Sessions Case No. 16 of 1965/31 of 1965 the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2011

Snehlata Gupta and ors. Vs. D.D.A. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-02-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.K. Saini; Mr. Sitab Ali Chaudhari; Mr. Vikas Saini, Advs.

1. The petitioners in the five writ petitions claim to be the purchasers of different portions of the construction on plot No. 213, Kailash Hills, New Delhi. The sub-lease of the land admeasuring 300 sq. yards...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 1995

Anz Grindlays Bank Pie Vs. the Commissioner, Mcd and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 343

Reported in : 1995IIAD(Delhi)573; 1995(34)DRJ492

Advocate for Appellant : P.N. Lekhi,; Sanjay Gupta,; Arun Jaitley,;

R.C. Lahoti, J.(1) There are two suits filed by two sets of persons touching the same property and seeking more or less : identical reliefs, though in a bit little different backdrop of events. Two applications...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 1999

H.H. Rijhwani Vs. N. Venkat Ramani and Either Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-08-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 30, 39, Rule 1 and 3; Constitution of India -- Article 227

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC13a; (1999)3MLJ750

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. A. Alagirisamy, Senior Counsel Adv.

ORDER1. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for either side in both the revision petitions, the revision petitions are taken up today for final disposal and they are disposed of.2. Heard Mr.K. Alagirisami senior...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2004

Asifnagar Smashanaghat Committee and ors. Vs. Shaik Yousuf

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-13-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 107(2) - Order 26, Rule 9

Reported in : 2004(5)ALD32; 2004(5)ALT106

Advocate for Appellant : T. Ramakrishna Rao, Adv.

ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. The petitioners/ appellants moved the above applications for appointment of Advocate-Commissioner to demarcate boundaries of the land in S.No. 22 paiki and the land in S.No. 24 of Asifnagar Village/Mandal, Hyderabad with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial