Advanced Search Results

Shishir Kumar @ Chunnu Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Lal Singh Thakur and; Nikhlesh Kumar, Advs. brother of Shishir Kumar, Adv.

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. We have perused the impugned decision which is most inchoate and verbose; not only the counsel for the appellant but even the counsel for the State agree that they cannot make any head...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Subedar Deena Nath Tiwari

Court : Allahabad

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Army Regulation - Sections 333(C); Army Act, 1950 - Sections 192; Army Rules

Reported in : II(1998)DMC731

Advocate for Appellant : Shishir Kumar, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. Two appeals being Special Appeal No. 317 of 1996 by Union of India and Special Appeal No. 376 of 1996 by Subedar Deena Nath Tiwari have been preferred respectively against the same judgment...

international Electron Devices Ltd. Vs. Collector (A), Cus. and C. Ex.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 1996(81)ELT207(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Shishir Kumar, Learned Standing Counsel

ORDERM.C. Agarwal, J.1. The petitioner has filed an appeal before the Collector (Appeals), Customs & Central Excise, Ghaziabad, against excise dues amounting to Rs. 16,25,414.97p. The petitioner moved an application under the proviso to Section 35F...

Chief of the Army Staff and ors. Vs. Daya Shanker Tiwari

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 79 and 80 - Order 1, Rule 9 - Order 27, Rule 1

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC2824

Advocate for Appellant : Shishir Kumar, Adv.

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This special appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order of the learned single Judge dated 5.3.2002, by which the writ petition of the respondent-petitioner has been allowed.2. Shri Shishir Kumar, learned...

Mangal Das Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 326; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rules 126L(16) and 136M

Reported in : 1989(24)ECC10; 1989(43)ELT636(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Shishir Kumar, Adv.

ORDERK.C. Agrawal, A.C.J.1. This petition under Article 326 of the Constitution has been filed by Mangal Das, son of Nihal Chand, resident of Madari Tola, Jaunpur, for a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2,who...

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Inder Deo Ojha and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2002)ACC332; 2003ACJ471

Advocate for Appellant : Shishir Kumar, Adv.

Sudhir Narain and V.M. Sahai, JJ.1. This appeal is directed against the award dated 7.9.2001 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gorakhpur (in short 'the Tribunal') awarding Rs. 1,50,000 as compensation to the claimants-respondents.2. The...

Sahdev Meshram Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Shishir Kumar Soni

CRR.No.2386/2012 Criminal Revision No.2386/2012 23.1.2013 Shri Shishir Kumar Soni, counsel for the applicant. Shri S.K.Kashyap, Public Prosecutor for the State/respondent. As prayed, heard the learned counsel for the parties finally. The learned JMFC, Balaghat (Shri Mahesh...

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Janardan Mishra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 174

Reported in : III(2004)ACC468; 2005(1)AWC750

Advocate for Appellant : Shishir Kumar, Adv.

Tarun Agarwala, J. 1. The respondent's son had died in an accident and accordingly, he moved an application for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act. During the pendency of the proceedings the matter was taken up...

U.P. Madhyamik Shikshak Sangh Through Its Allahabad Zila Mantri Vs. St ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR804]

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Shishir Kumar

Vineet Saran, J.1. Heard Sri Shishir Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents and perused the record.2. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for...

Naik Ravi Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71, 80, 110, 116 and 120; Army Rules, 1952 - Rules 22 and 31; Army Regulations - Regulations 8, 9, 16, 19, 23, 24, 30, 44, 52, 53 and 54

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC392

Advocate for Appellant : G.D. Mukerji, Adv.

D. K. Seth, J. 1. The petitioner was subjected to District Court Marshal and awarded punishment of dismissal by order dated 15.6.1988, contained inAnnexure-4 to the writ petition along with two other punishments viz., six months...