Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shireesh kumar · Page 1 of about 4 results (0.036 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 12 2007

Surendra Kumar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-12-2007

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(116)FLR799]

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shireesh Kumar

Pradeep Kant and Rajiv Sharma, JJ.1. Heard Mr. Shireesh Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Shukla, learned Standing Counsel.With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being disposed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2000

Surendra Kumar Khanna Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-25-2000

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC143; (2001)3UPLBEC2046

Advocate for Appellant : Shireesh Kumar, Adv.

Bhanwar Singh, J.1. Sri Surendra Kumar Khanna has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to count the services rendered by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2010

Prabhuji and anr. Vs. State of U.P. Thru Secy. Appointment and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-16-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Abhishek Yadav; Ashwani Kumar; Shireesh Kumar, Advs

1. The dispute between the promotees and direct recruits in the cadre of Higher Judicial Service of the State of Uttar Pradesh, has been the unending process since decades. Either side being the member of same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 29 2003

Public Services Tribunal Bar Association Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-29-2003

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 3(6), 3(7), 3(8), 3(4A), 4, 4(1), 5, 5(1), 5(5), 5(7), 5(5B), 5A, 5B, 5C, 6(1), 6(7), 7 and 28; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 32, 213(2), 226, 227, 309, 311, 313 and 323A; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) (Amendment) Act, 1977; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) (Amendment) Act, 1982; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 6(2); Central Tribunal Act, 1985; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) (Amendment) Act, 1992 - Sections 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 5(3) and 5(4); Contempt of Courts Act; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) (Amendment) Ordinance, 1994; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribunal) (Amendment) Ordinance, 1995; Uttar Pradesh Public Services (Tribuna

Reported in : AIR2003SC1115; [2003(96)FLR1048]; JT2003(1)SC534; 2003(1)SCALE564; (2003)4SCC104; [2003]1SCR666; 2003(2)SLJ14(SC); (2003)1UPLBEC780; MANU/SC/0062/2003

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Venugopal,; Ranjit Kumar and; P.P. Rao, Sr. Advs.,;

Bhan, J.1. These appeals are directed against a common order passed by a Full Bench of Five Judges of the High Court of Allahabad in Civil Writ Petition No. 4285 (MB) of 1999, Public Services Tribunal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial