Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shekhar naphade · Page 1 of about 244 results (0.136 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 2003

The Court on It's Own Motion Vs. Sou. Jayashree Khadilkar Pandey,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Commision of Enquiries Act, 1952

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)129; 2003BomCR(Cri)1405

Advocate for Appellant : N.P. Bapat and ;Hemangi Prabhu for the Contemnor ;Nilkanth khadilkar and ;N.P. Bapat, Adv. and ;G.V. Limaye for Contemnor ;Jayshree Khadilkar Pandey;Shekhar Naphade, Senior Counsel (Amicus Curie)

Palshikar, J.The facts giving arise to this suo motu proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are as follows: 2. That the Government of Maharashtra had appointed one man commission under the Commission of Enquiries Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 2007

Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahiman Patel and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-10-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 324 and 326

Reported in : JT2007(9)SC194; 2007(9)SCALE72; (2007)9SCC1; 2007AIRSCW4576; (2007)3Crimes206; (2007)3SCC(Cri)323(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)2257; 2008(3)KCCRSN207(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Naphade,; S.K. Aggarawal and; Ranjit Kumar, Sr.

B.N. Agarwal, J.1. Seventeen accused persons were charged and tried for offences under Sections 147, 148, 302/149, 302 read with Section 34, 307/149, 326/149 and 324/149 of the Indian Penal Code [`IPC' for short] and by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2009

Pralhad and ors. Vs. Deorao and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-12-2009

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 60, 72, 73, 73(1A), 78, 78(1) and 157; Constitution of India - Articles 39 and 162

Reported in : 2009(8)SCALE211:2009AIRSCW6534

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv.,; Shivaji M. Jadhav,; Lenin S. Hij

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against a judgment and order dated 6.5.2008 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay bench at Aurangabad in Writ Petition No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 03 2009

Priyanka Estates International Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Assam a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-03-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Guwahati Municipal Corporation Act, 1971 - Sections 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 337, 416, 438, 438(2) and 438(3); Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority Act - Sections 24, 25, 30 and 88; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 351; Constitution of India - Articles 142, 226 and 227; Master Plans, Zoning Plans Regulations

Reported in : 2009(14)SCALE353; 2010(1)LC114(SC); 2009(6)LHSC4116.

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Naphade,; Mukul Rohtagi,; Vijay Hansaria,;

Deepak Verma, J.1. Leave granted.2. The principal question that emerges for consideration in these appeals is whether to sustain the order of demolition as passed by the Gauhati High Court vide impugned judgment and order or...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2007

Manzar Sayeed Khan Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-05-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 153, 153A, 153B and 505(2)

Reported in : AIR2007SC2074; 2007CriLJ2959; JT2007(5)SC335; 2007(5)SCALE445; (2007)5SCC1; 2007AIRSCW3189; (2007)2SCC(Cri)417; (2007)2Crimes228(SC); JT2007(5)SC335; 2007LawHerald(SC)1508; 2007(2)KCCRSN82; 2007(4)AIRKarR310(SC); [2007] 4 SCR 907

Advocate for Appellant : Soli J. Sorabjee, Sr. Adv.,; Kamini Jaiswal,; Somila Bakshi

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. Leave granted.2. Manzar Sayeed Khan and Vinod Hansraj Goyal have filed these two appeals against the common order dated 06.05.2004 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2010

State of Maharashtra Vs. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2010

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 28, 30, 33, 34, 34(2), 34(3) and 37; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24 and 29(2) - Schedule - Article 158; ;Specific Relief Act - Section 42; ;Arbitration Act, 1940; ;Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section 81; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 21, Rule 103 - Order 41, Rules 2 and 3

Reported in : JT2010(3)SC420

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv.,; Sanjay V. Kharde,; Chimoy A. K

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Leave granted.2. The question presented in this appeal by special leave is : whether in an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short `1996 Act') from an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2009

Pandurang Chandrakant Mhatre and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-08-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 114, 141, 142, 147, 148, 149, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 154(1), 155, 156, 157, 161, 162, 169, 170, 173, 173(2) and 173(8)

Reported in : (2009)10SCC773; 2009(10)LC4611(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Sundravardhan,; A.K. Srivastava,; Shekhar Naphade and

R.M. Lodha, J.1. This criminal appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay whereby the Division Bench of that Court upturned the judgment of acquittal passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2007

Manilal Hiraman Chaudhari Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-09-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 302, 341 and 506

Reported in : AIR2008SC161; JT2007(12)SC618; 2007(11)SCALE736; 2007AIRSCW6362; (2007)4Crimes188(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv.,; Sudhanshu Choudhari,; Rajshri D

S.B. Sinha, J.1. One Manilal Hiraman Chaudhari is before us being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 17.10.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 2009

Jitendra Panchal Vs. Intelligence Officer, Ncb and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-03-2009

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 12, 20, 23, 24, 27A, 29 and 67; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(37) and 3(38); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41 and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2(n), 221, 300, 300(1) and 403; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 14(7), 20, 20(2), 367 and 372; Legal Realism and Natural Law

Reported in : AIR2009SC1938; 2009(57)BLJR816; RLW2009(1)SC853; 2009(2)SCALE202; (2009)3SCC57; 2009(2)LC562(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : K.T.S. Tulsi,; Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Advs.,; V. Hari Pillai

Altamas Kabir, J.1. This appeal raises an interesting legal conundrum involving the laws of the United States of America, hereinafter referred to as 'the USA', and the domestic laws as existing in India. At the heart...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2009

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Casteribe Ra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 3(13), 5, 5(1), 5(4), 7, 20(1), 21, 21(1), 23, 26, 28, 30, 30(1) and 32; Trade Union Act; BIR Act; Industrial Disputes Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(4), 21, 32, 39, 142, 226, 309, 320 and 335

Reported in : JT2009(11)SC609; (2009)IVLLJ286SC; 2009(12)SCALE25; (2009)8SCC556; 2009(9)LC4242(SC):2009AIRSCW6104

Advocate for Appellant : Altaf Ahmad and; Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Advs.,; R.S. Hedge,

R.M. Lodha, J.1. Principally, two questions which this Court is called upon to determine in this group of five civil appeals by special leave are:(one) : Whether a direction to the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial