Advanced Search Results

State of Bihar, Etc. Vs. Mukul Mahto and ors. Etc.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

A.K. Prasad, J.1. This appeal under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the State of Bihar is directed against the judgment dated 2nd February, 1990, in ST No. 37 of 1985 passed by Sri...

State of Jharkhand Vs. Birendra Kumar Pandey and Ram Bilash Singh Meht ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2006(2)JCR128(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Sheela Prasad, G.P. IV and; Shyam Krishna Sahay,;JC to GP IV

R.K. Merathia and D.P. Singh, JJ.1. These two Letters Patent Appeals arising out of the common order dated 6.3.2002 allowing the writ petitions-CWJC Nos. 2168 and 2223 of 2001 were heard together and are being disposed...

Ravi Nandkeolyar Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR991

Advocate for Appellant : Sheela Prasad, Adv.

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard Mrs. Sheela Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs. I. Sen Choud-hary, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Housing Board.2. The petitioner has challenged the notice dated 29.12.1998 as contained in...

Bharat Rubber Regenerating Co. Ltd. Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Co ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A, 7A(1), 7A(4), 7B, 7Q, 8F, 14, 14B, 15(2), 17, 17(5) and 32A; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provision) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 4; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193, 196 and 228; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR2749; [2008(4)JCR70(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Sheela Prasad, Adv.

Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 24th August, 2007 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the provisions of Section 14(B) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act,...

The State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Sadanand Thakur and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Cadre and Conditions of Service of the Ministerial Staff of the Department of Education Rules - Rule 74

Reported in : 2005(3)BLJR1847; [2005(4)JCR158(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Sheela Prasad, Adv.

ORDER1. This appeal, at the instance of the State of Jharkhand, is directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge on 10th March, 2003, allowing the writ application filed by the respondent...

Shri Babu Ram Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)90TTJ(Delhi)332

These cross appeals, one by the revenue and the other by the assessee .for the assessment year 1991-92, are directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). As the grounds involved in both the appeals are...

Sadhan Chandra Roy Vs. Animal Husbandary Department

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (S) No. 2242 of 2015 Sadhan Chandra Roy ...… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Principal Secretary, Animal Husbandry Deptt. Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.2. The...

Manindra Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law

Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR1596; [2001(90)FLR75]

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 24.4.2000 and 18.9.2000 whereby the resignation submitted by thepetitioner has been rejected and the petitioner has been dismissed from service.2....

Bijay Charan Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)BLJR228; [2005(1)JCR509(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Ram Kishore Prasad, Adv.

ORDER1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the order dated 20th August, 2003, passed in W.P. (S) No. 4100 of 2003, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition and refused...

Ravi Dutt Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Industrial Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 4 and 24

Reported in : [2003(2)JCR622(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Adv. and; Saurav Arun, Adv.

Tapen Sen, J. 1. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioner and Mrs. Sheela Prasad, learned Additional Central Government Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 2. The petitioner in the instant case has...