Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sharad sharma · Page 1 of about 38 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 18 2000

Satya Prakash Srivastava Vs. Yogendra Narain, Chief Secretary, U.P., L ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-18-2000

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12

Reported in : 2000(2)AWC1719; (2000)2UPLBEC1259

Advocate for Appellant : Shekhar Srivastava and ;Sharad Sharma, Advs.

B. K. Rathi, J.1. This is a petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the opposite party for disobeying the order of this Court, dated 21.2.1998. passed in Writ Petition No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2004

Rahul Sharma Vs. Dhanesh Gupta

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Aug-07-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972; Small Causes Courts Act - Sections 25

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC511

Advocate for Appellant : Sharad Sharma, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Sharad Sharma, learned Counsel for the revisionist and Standing Counsel for the respondent.2. By the present revision, the revisionist has prayed for setting aside the order dated 22.11.2002 passed by Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2005

Bhu Prakash and anr. Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Mar-04-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 13(1), 13(3), 21, 21(1) and 22; Bombay Rent, Hostel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(10); Bombay Rent Restriction Act, 1939 - Sections 11; Rent Control Act, 1948 - Sections 11(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC715

Advocate for Appellant : Sharad Sharma, learned Counsel

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Mr. Sharad Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.C. Maulekhi, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. By the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ, order or direction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 2005

Ahmad Sayeed Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Feb-16-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21 and 21(1); Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949; Contract Act - Sections 10 and 23; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rule 16 and 16(2)

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC730

Advocate for Appellant : Sharad Sharma, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Mr. Sharad Sharma, Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.K. Bisht, Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Seema Sirohi, Counsel for the respondents.By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 2003

Keshi Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Mussorie Dehradun Development Auth ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Aug-22-2003

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR2004Utr41

Advocate for Appellant : L.P. Naithani, Sr. Counsel and; Sharad Sharma, Advs.

M.M. Ghildiyal, J.1. By means of this petition the petitioners have challenged order dated 22-10-2002 by which the sanction of map No. C-12/2000-2001 was cancelled and order dated 4-4-2003 passed by the Secretary, Mussoorie Dehradun Development...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 2010

Hari Singh S/O Sri Chander Singh. Vs. Guman Singh, and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Aug-09-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226 Read with Article 227 ; Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Section 8, 9, 48 ; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Section 11A ;

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sharad Sharma; Mr. Kamlesh Lohani, Advs.

1) By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 15.09.2003, passed by the Consolidation Officer; order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2003

Rajesh Kumar Gautam Vs. Maha Mandleshwar Vedabayasanad Geeta Ashram

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-17-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 26, Rule 9

Reported in : AIR2004Utr30

Advocate for Appellant : Sharad Sharma, Adv.

ORDERRajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Sharad Sharma for the revisionist and Sri Alok Singh for the respondents.2. The present revision has been filed against the order dated 30-10-2002 passed on the application under Order XXVI, Rule...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2019

Sg Enterprises & Ors. Vs.ballapur Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-16-2019

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anurag Pandey, Ms. Shyamali Das, Mr. B.P. Subba

$~ 6 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO4532017 Decided on:-"16th October, 2019 SG ENTERPRISES & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anurag Pandey, Ms. Shyamali Das & Mr. B.P. Subba, Advs. versus...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2010

ishwari Singh Rautela Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Apr-17-2010

Subject : Service

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. Heard Mr. Sharad Sharma, the learned Senior Counsel duly assisted by Ms. Indu Sharma, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D.S. Patni and Mr. A.S. Bisht, the learned Counsel for the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2012

Surendra Singh and Others Vs. A.D.J./1st Fast Track and Others

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jan-02-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Heard Shri Sharad Sharma, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Anirudha Joshi, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Arvind Vashistha, the learned counsel for the respondents. The land, in question, was acquired in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial