Advanced Search Results
Claude Pinto and Others Vs. M.V. Shankar Bhat and Another
Karnataka
Apr-04-1996
FamilyProperty
Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 82, 88, 211(1), 258, 259 and 307(1); Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 7 and 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 99 - Order I, Rule 10(2) - Order 22, Rule 4 - Order 41, Rule 27; Probate and Administration Act - Sections 45; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 20(2)
AIR1996Kant366; ILR1996KAR2229; 1996(3)KarLJ342
Bhavani Shankar Rao, Adv.
1. The appellants herein, the defendants in the trial Court, have preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 11-3-1993 passed by the Principal Civil Judge, Mangalore, in O.S. No. 26/1981 decreeing the suit of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYalamanchilli Venkataramiah Vs. Garikipati Janapaiyya and anr.
Chennai
Sep-02-1949
Civil
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144 and 209
AIR1950Mad831
N.V.B. Shankar Rao, Adv.
Raghava Rao, J.1. The defendant in a suit for damages for malicious prosecution is the appellant before me in this second appeal. The malicious prosecution alleged pertains to certain proceedings under Section 144, Criminal P. C.,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeep Industrial Syndicate Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-20-1990
Sales Tax
Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1)
[1992]86STC64(Kar)
M.P. Chandrakantaraj Urs, J. 1. The question formulated for our determination is as follows : On the facts and in the circumstances of the case whether the discount equivalent to freight charges allowed amounts to 'other...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dr. Pinnamaneni Narasimha Rao Vs. Gundavarau Jayaprakasu and Another
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-01-1989
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80
I(1990)ACC468; 1990ACJ350; AIR1990AP207
Advocate General and; P. Ramachandra Reddy, Adv.
1. The two appeals and the cross-objections arise out of the judgment of the learned First Additional District Judge, Guntur In O. S. No.34 of 1969 granting a decree for Rs. 22,000/ - in favour of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.R. Krishnappa Vs. Bhagyalakshmamma and ors.
Karnataka
Mar-10-1981
Company
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A; Civil Procedure Court, 1908 - Sections 21; Validating Act, 1936
ILR1982KAR228; 1981(2)KarLJ425
Shri. Bhavani Shankar Rao
Sabhahit, J.1. This appeal by the owner of the bus in question (original respondent No. 1) is directed against the judgment and award dated March 5, 1979, passed by the Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mandya,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatilal Bros. Vs. the Govt. of Mysore and anr.
Karnataka
Nov-06-1950
Tenancy
Mysore House Rent and Accommodation Control Order; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1951Kant66; AIR1951Mys66; ILR1951KAR99
R. Shankar Rao, Adv. for K.V. Subbarao, Adv.
Yenkata Ramaiya, J. 1. This petn. is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of writs of certiorari & prohibition to quash the order passed by reap. 1 & for a direction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskController of Examination, Board of Intermediate Examinations, Hyderab ...
Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Feb-10-1993
Land Acquisition
Shri. Shankar Rao
A. Venkatarami Reddy, President: 1. The respondent in this appeal, who is student studying intermediate, filed the C.D. No. 565 of 1991 in the District Forum Prakasham. Her grievance was that she passed intermediate second year,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwarnjee Singh Vs. Asharam Gamne
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-26-2000
Tenancy
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 22, Rule 10; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1)
2001(1)MPHT396
Shri Alok Aradhe, Adv.
ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. In this civil revision preferred under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') the defendant-petitioner has called in question the legal validity of the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.A. Khan and ors. Vs. Ameer Khan and ors.
Karnataka
Mar-28-1952
Commercial
Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 4, 30, 30(1) and 37; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 65 and 247
AIR1952Kant131; AIR1952Mys131; ILR1951KAR486; (1953)31MysLJ103
A.V. Shankara Rao, Adv.
1. Plaintiffs 1 to 6 are the sons of Defendant 4. The age of the eldest i.e. plaintiff 1's age was 18 when the suit was filed in forma pauperis, on 9-10-46, by him and his...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Vijay Laxmi and ors. Vs. Smt. K. Simachalan @ Simachalan
Jharkhand
Feb-16-2004
FamilyCivil
Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 372 and 373(3)
AIR2005Jhar8; [2004(2)JCR641(Jhr)]
V.K. Prasad, Adv.
ORDER1. The appellants before us claiming to be the wife and children of one K. Shankar Rao, filed an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act for the issue of a succession certificate. A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »