Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shaligram · Page 1 of about 162 results (0.094 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 24 1998

Salim Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-24-1998

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 215; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - Sections 4

Reported in : I(1999)DMC701

Advocate for Appellant : Shaligram, Adv.

J.G. Chitre, J.1. The petitioner is hereby assailing the correctness, propriety and legality of the order of conviction and sentence passed against him by the Trial Court convicting for an offence under Section 4 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2008

The State of Bihar Vs. Bahadur Yadav

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-09-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 27; Evidence Act - Sections 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 300, 302, 304, 326 and 379; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 164, 311, 313 and 315

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Singh, Neeraj Singh, Ranjeet Prasad and Sibesh Mishra, Advs.

Mridula Mishra, J.1. Death Reference No. 2 of 2006 has been heard analogous with Criminal Appeal No. 111 of 2006 (Medi Paswan v. The State of Bihar), Criminal Appeal No. 167 of 2007 (Ram Bilash Mandal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2000

Ratan Singh and Another Vs. Shaligram and Another

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-05-2000

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 27 and 65; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 38; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11, 151 and 152 - Order 6, Rule 6 - Order 21, Rule 35; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 46; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 35; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6

Reported in : 2001(1)MPHT97

Advocate for Appellant : Shri N.S. Kale, Sr. Adv.

ORDERA.K. Mishra, J. 1. Plaintiff has filed the present Letters Patent Appeal aggrieved by the dismissal of suit by learned single Judge, which was decreed by the Trial Court.2. The case has a chackered history. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 17 2002

Ram Udit Choudhary @ Nunu Babu Choudhary Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-17-2002

Subject : Criminal

Someshwar Nath Pathak, J.1. The aforesaid Criminal Appeal and Criminal Revision have been heard analogous, as both of them have been preferred against the common judgment dated 23rd September, 1999 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1997

Bank Karmachari Sangh Vs. the Cosmos Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-12-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 4, 17 and 30(2); Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 101(2-A); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 78(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11-A and 25-F

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR255; 1998(2)BomCR692; 1998(1)MhLj297

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Singhvi and ;Mrs. Meena H. Doshi, Advs.

ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. This petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to call...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1959

Rajah Malraju Venkata Rama Kondal Rao Bahadur Zamindar Varu Vs. Rani R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-28-1959

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Hindu Law; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 113

Reported in : AIR1960AP509

Advocate for Appellant : Sankara Sastri and ;T. Veerabhadrayya, Advs.

Ansari, J. 1. The plaintiff is the appellant and seeks to reverse the decree by the Subordinate Judge, dismissing his suit to obtain possession of the properties, which had been later converted into one for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2004

Kisan S/O Sukhdeo Lokhande Vs. Collector and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-12-2004

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2004(4)ALLMR812; 2004(3)MhLj742

Advocate for Appellant : N.P. Dhote, Adv.

B.R. Gavai, J.1. The present petition came to be filed by the petitioner praying for quashing and setting aside the revised selection list issued by the respondent No. 1 and further direction to implement the select...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2006

Committee of Management, Shri Shaligram Sharma (P.G.) Smarak College, ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-19-2006

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2215

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Khare and ;S.K. Srivastava, Advs.

Rajesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.2. Shri Shaligram Sharma Smarak (P.G.) College, Rasna, Meerut (hereinafter referred to as the College) was granted affiliation under self-financing scheme in 1997 fur running...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2001

Bapulal and anr. Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-14-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 363, 366 and 376

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT70

Advocate for Appellant : Ganesh Verma, Adv.

S.L. Kochar, J.1. Both these appellants have preferred this appeal against the judgment and findings dated 3-2-1993, passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Neemuch District Mandsaur in Sessions Trial No. 291/91 thereby convicting appellant No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 17 2002

Pandurang Kalu Patil and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-17-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 3, 25, 26 and 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 149, 302 and 307

Reported in : AIR2002SC733; (2002)2BOMLR347; 2002CriLJ1007; 2002(1)Crimes270(SC); (2002)3GLR2380; JT2002(1)SC229; 2002(1)SCALE290; (2002)2SCC490; [2002]1SCR338; 2002(1)UJ532(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : S.R. Chitnis, Sr. Adv.,; Sunil Kumar Verma and; Shivaji M. J

1. A Division Bench of the High court of Bombay has ventured to disagree with a ratio which has become locus classicus and well stood the long period of half-a-century. That ratio is the one laid...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial