Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sethi · Page 1 of about 9,545 results (0.275 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 07 1995

Virender Kumar Yadav and Mukhtiar Yadav Alias Mukho Yadav Alias Raju V ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-07-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 201 and 302; Evidence Act - Sections 24, 27, 30, 114 and 133

Reported in : 1996CriLJ231; 60(1995)DLT391; 1995(34)DRJ360

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Sethi,; Baljeet Singh Dhir and; Ms. Kanwal Inder Ka

P.K. Bhari, J.1. Virender Kumar Yadav and Mukhtiar Yadav alias Mukho Yadav alias Raju have been convicted of offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 2013

Present:mr.Akshay Bhan Advocate Vs. the Publisher Times of India Chand ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Civil Writ Petition No.7160 of 2013 (O&M) :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 04 2013 Courts on its own motion .....Petitioner VERSUS The Publisher, Times of India,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 1959

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sansar Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-16-1959

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 149; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 8 and 8(1); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56, 73, 126 and 127

Reported in : AIR1960HP1

Advocate for Appellant : L.N. Sethi, Adv.

T. Ramabhadaran, J.C.1. This appeal, by a plaintiff, arises out of a suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 32,726/-/-, representing the balance due to him (the plaintiff) from defendants 1 and 2 (Sansar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 23 2006

National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) Vs. China Coal Constructio ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-23-2006

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 8, 9, 11, 11(6), 17, 34, 36, 37 and 37(2); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 23, Rule 1 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi134; 2006(1)ARBLR265(Delhi); 127(2006)DLT766; 2006(87)DRJ225

Advocate for Appellant : Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. and; Sindhu Mohan, Adv; Chetan Sha

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J1. This order shall dispose of is Nos.6880/2005, 6881/2005 and OMP 351/2004. The said OMP has been filed by the petitioner--National Highways Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as 'NHAI') under section 9...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2026

Stunning Dentistry Through Its Proprietor Priyank Sethi vs Union of In ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Balbir Singh, Mr. Ashish Mohan, Mr. Ajinkya Gunjan Mishra, Mr. Ashish Singh, Ms. Avani Tewari, Ms. Shivali Shah, Mr. Naman Tandon, Mr. Ritwik Mishra, Mr. Aditya Ganju, Mr. Auritro Mukherjee, Mr. Vatsal Agrawal, Mr. Samanyu Sethi, Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Mr. Atul Tripathi, Mr. Shubham Mishra, Mr. Gaurav Mani Tripathi, Mr. Akshay Sagar, Mr. Madhav Anand

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2847/2026 & CM APPL. 13793/2026STUNNING DENTISTRY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETORPRIYANK SETHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Senior Advocate and Mr. Ashish Mohan, Senior Advocate with Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 1991

Sanjeev Sethi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-04-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : (1991)101CTR(Del)81; 47(1992)DLT144; ILR1992Delhi656; [1992]195ITR338(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Syali,; Satyen Sethi,; H.D. Shourie,;

B.N. Kirpal, J. (1) The challenge in this writ petition is to the order passed under Section 269 UD(1) by the Appropriate Authority under the Income-tax Act (respondent No. 2), whereby it has decided to purchase...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2006

Village Pul Pehladpur Residents Welfare Association and ors. Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-02-2006

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT313; 2006(87)DRJ258

Advocate for Appellant : Ravindra Sethi, Sr. Adv. and; Arun Kaushal, Adv; Rajeev Ban

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. This Petition prays for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 'not to apply pick and choose policy to demolish the houses of the residents and dispossess the occupants which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1992

Ram Sarup Vs. Brahma Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-01-1992

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 39

Reported in : 1992(23)DRJ242

Advocate for Appellant : Ravinder Sethi,; Nandini Sahni,; Mukul Rohatagi and Amrita

P.N. Nag, J.(1) This Second Appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter called the Act) has arisen out of an order dated 15.2.1991 passed by Shri O.P. Dwivedi, Rent Control Tribunal whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 1997

Raj Mani Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-11-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)1014; 1997CriLJ3879; 1997(3)Crimes273; 67(1997)DLT351; 1997(42)DRJ270

Advocate for Appellant : Sunil Sethi and; P.K. Behl, Advs

N.G. Nandi, J.(1) The appellant stands convicted for the offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code . for the murder of Dhani Ram, S/o Ram Nihar and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life vide impugned judgment...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1981

Bhanwarlal Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-1981

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 17, 19 and 21; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 265

Reported in : AIR1981MP220; 1981MPLJ35

Advocate for Appellant : K.L. Sethi, Adv.

Sohani, J. 1. This Full Bench has been constituted to hear this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution on a reference being made by a Division Bench of this Court which initially heard this petition....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial