Advanced Search Results
Raju Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-25-2001
Criminal
Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5A, 8 and 18; Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - Sections 11D; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 3 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 379 and 401
2002CriLJ124
Satish Trivedi and ;Anil Kumar Singh, Advs.
ORDERR.B. Misra, J. 1. The above mentioned Criminal Misc, Application, Writ Petition and Criminal Misc. Revision involve the common question relating to the order of learned Judicial Magistrate as well as learned Sessions Judge, rejecting the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPraveen Kumar Maurya at Praveen Maurya Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Sep-16-2010
Education
Sheshadri Trivedi; Satish Trivedi, Advs
1. Heard Mr. Satish Trivedi, the learned senior counsel for the revisionist and the learned AGA for the respondent and perused the record. 2. This is a revision against the judgement and order dated 18.6.2010 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Swami Nath Yadav and ors. Vs. Contemners
Allahabad
Sep-28-2000
CriminalContempt of Court
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 302, 307, 323, 332, 353, 394, 395, 504 and 506; Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 13, 15 and 15(1); Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 7; Advocates Act 1961 - Sections 49(1)
2001CriLJ639
Satish Trivedi, Adv.
1. This common Judgment disposes of Criminal Contempt Case Nos. 16 of 1999 & 19 of 1999 which were initiated by us vide our order dated 24-3-1999, which reads thus :-Sri S.S. Nimesh. I/C District Judge,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gufran Ahmad and anr Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Feb-24-2010
Criminal
Indian penal code (IPC) - sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 506 and 120-B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.P.C) - Section 161.; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Section 7
Ajay Kumar Pandey; Anil Kumar Shukla; Shri Satish Trivedi, Advs
1. These two bail applications have been filed relating to the same case crime no. 34 of 2005 under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 506 and 120-B IPC and section 7 of the Criminal Law...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh S/O Mohan and ors. Vs. State
Allahabad
Mar-04-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 300; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3
2004CriLJ3540
M.B. Lal, ;Satish Trivedi, ;A.K. Srivastava, ;Imranullah, ;G.S. Chaturvedi and ;P.K. Srivastava, Advs.
M.C. Jain, J.1. Four appellants, namely, Rakesh, Ram Babu, Rajendra Kumar alias Rajjan and Basant preferred this appeal against judgment and order dated 6-6-1980 passed by Sri D.K. Trivedi, the then VII Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjai Kumar Kashyap Vs. District and Sessions Judge and ors.
Allahabad
May-05-2006
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 21, 41, 42 and 50; Uttar Pradesh Narcotic Drug Rules, 1986 - Rules 2, 77 and 79; Uttar Pradesh Narcotic Drug (Amendment) Rules, 1989
2006CriLJ2954
Satish Trivedi, ;K.J. Khare, ;B.J. Srivastava, ;S.S. Giri and ;Shashank Shekhar, Advs.
ORDERR.C. Deepak, J.1. Heard Sri Satish Trivedi, learned senior counsel assisted by Sri S.S. Giri and Sri Krishan Ji Khare, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.L. Kesarwani, learned Counsel for the State and perused the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRafat Mian Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Dec-02-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 307, 376 and 511; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313
2000CriLJ3039
Satish Trivedi, Adv.
M.C. Jain, J.1. The appellant is one Rafat Mian, who has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 31-5-85 passed by Sri B. N. Srivastava, the then Sessions Judge, Bareilly in Sessions Trial No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohd. Ismail Vs. Smt. Bilquees Bano
Allahabad
Apr-08-1997
FamilyCriminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 125(2)
II(1998)DMC68
Satish Trivedi, Adv.
P.K. Jain, J.1. Heard Mr. Satish Trivedi, learned Counsel for the revisionist. None appears for opposite party-Smt. Bilquees Bano.2. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.2.1984 passed by Sri. U.C. Dhyani, Ilnd...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmarawati and anr. (Smt.) Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Oct-15-2004
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226; Criminal Proceure Code , 1973 - Sections 2, 41, 42, 43, 44, 157(1), 167(2), 439(1) and 482
2005(1)AWC416; 2005CriLJ755; (2005)1UPLBEC155
V.P. Srivastava, ;S.P.S. Raghav, ;Satish Trivedi, ;Viresh Mishra, ;D.S. Misra and ;P.N. Misra, Advs.
Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.1. This Full Bench is constituted to consider the following questions :1. Whether the arrest of an accused is a must if cognizable offence is disclosed in the FIR or in a criminal complaint;2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Rai Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Sep-18-1997
Criminal
Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-social Activities (Prevention) Act - Sections 2, 3, 7 and 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 370, 427, 448, 504 and 508; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 439
1998CriLJ4163
Satish Trivedi, Adv.
ORDERS.K. Phaujdar, J.1. The matter was heard yesterday in the presence of Sri Satish Trivedi for the applicant, Sri. J.S. Senger for the complainant and the learned AGA for the State.2. The applicant Rajesh Rai stood...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »