Advanced Search Results
Raju Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jul-25-2001
Criminal
Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 5A, 8 and 18; Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - Sections 11D; Essential Commodities Act - Sections 3 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 379 and 401
2002CriLJ124
Satish Trivedi and ;Anil Kumar Singh, Advs.
ORDERR.B. Misra, J. 1. The above mentioned Criminal Misc, Application, Writ Petition and Criminal Misc. Revision involve the common question relating to the order of learned Judicial Magistrate as well as learned Sessions Judge, rejecting the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadan Mohan Lal Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Feb-05-1998
Service
Constitution of India - Article 311(2)
1998(2)AWC1042; (1998)2UPLBEC1451
Satish Dwivedi, Adv.
O.P. Garg, J. 1. By means of the writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed that the order dated 12.3.1996 passed by respondent No. 2, Senior Superintendent of District...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAmmonia Supplies Corporation (P) Ltd. Vs. Modern Plastic Containers (P ...
Delhi
Oct-11-1993
Company
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 155
[1994]79CompCas163(Delhi); 52(1993)DLT252; 1993(27)DRJ482; 1994RLR83
Satish Chander,; Sarat Chandra and; S.K. Kaul, Advs
Y.K. Sabharwal, J.(1) The short point for determination in this matter is the nature of jurisdiction the Company Court exercises under Section 155 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act') while dealing with petitions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madhuban Pvt. Ltd. Vs. NaraIn Dass Gokal Chand
Delhi
Oct-20-1979
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10 and 434
7(1971)DLT371
Satish Chander and; Harnam Das, Advs
P.N. Khanna, J.(1) This appeal under section 483 of the Companes Act, 1956 by the appellant company, 13 directed against the order dated April, 1, 1970 of the Learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, whereby he ordered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDirectorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. Girish Dhawan
Delhi
May-01-2006
CustomsCriminal
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 132, 135(1) and 135(1)(2); Antiquities and Art Treasurer Act, 1972
129(2006)DLT588; 2006(203)ELT369(Del)
Satish Aggarwal, Adv
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. These three revision petitions are being disposed of by a common order inasmuch as they raise common issues, although there are separate orders which are impugned in these petitions. 2. The facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManisha Koirala-ii Vs. Shashilal Nair and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-17-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 2A; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5E and 6
2003(2)BomCR647
Satish Maneshinde, Adv., i/b., Mulla and Mulla
R.M. Lodha, J.1. We heard Mr. Satish Maneshinde, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Iqbal Chagla, learned Senior Counsel for respondent No. 1.2. The appellant is the original plaintiff in Suit No. 2750 of 2002...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSardar Bhagwan Singh Chawla Vs. Cit
Allahabad
Feb-03-2005
Direct Taxation
[2006]155TAXMAN605(All)
Mr. Satish Mandhyan, Adv. for the Assessee , Mr. Shambhoo Chopra, Adv. for the Revenue.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, has referred the following question of law under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for opinion to this Court:'Whether, the penalty imposed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Chandrakanta Shrivastava Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Chhattisgarh
Sep-06-2002
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 438; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 307
2003(1)MPHT94(CG)
P.R. Bhave, Sr. Adv. and; Hamida Siddiqui and; Satish Gu
ORDERFakhruddin, J. 1. Heard. 2. Anticipating arrest in connection with Crime No, 2/2002 registered at Police Station, Chakradarnagar, Tehsil and District Raigarh, for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34, IPC, the petitioner...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDinesh Kumar Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-01-2004
ServiceConstitution
(2005)2UPLBEC1309
N.C. Rajvanshi, ;M.K. Rajvanshi, ;P.C. Srivastava and ;Satish Mandhyan, Advs.
Vineet Saran, J. 1. Since common questions of law and facts and involved in both these writ petitions hence they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The writ petitioners...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahalakshmi Fibres and Industrial Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour C ...
Jharkhand
Apr-28-2003
ServiceLabour and Industrial
Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33 and 33(2)
[2003(3)JCR31(Jhr)]
Satish Bakshi, Adv.
Tapen Sen, J.1. Heard Mr. Satish Bak-shi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashwini Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.2. In his writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »