Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sathyabama · Page 1 of about 56 results (0.081 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 07 2026

N.Mahalakshmi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-07-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 07/04/2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WP(MD). No.9295 to 9308 of 2026 and WMP(MD)Nos.7434, 7441, 7438, 7443, 7444, 7462, 7464, 7456, 7459, 7448, 7450, 7451,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2006

Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (a Deemed to Be Univers ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-13-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 2 3, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 20(1), 22, 23 and 24; All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 2 3, 10, 10(1), 11 11(1), 11(3), 11(4), 13, 22 and 22(2); All India Council for Technical Education Regulations, 2005, - Rules 3, 4 and 5; All India Council for Technical Education Regulations, 1994 - Regulation 3; University Grants Commission (Inspection of Universities) Rules, 2004 - Rule 3; University Grants Commission (Returns of Information by Universities) Rules, 2004; Constitution of India - Article 14; Bharathidasan University Act, 1981; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : (2006)3MLJ870

Advocate for Appellant : P. Subba Reddy, Adv. in W.P.2033/2006;Rajeev Dhawan, Senior Counsel for ;V. Ayyadurai, Adv. in W.Ps. 38316/2005 and 6400/2006, ;R. Krishnamoorthy, Senior Counsel for ;V. Ayyadurai, Adv. in W.Ps. 38316

ORDERPrabha Sridevan, J.1. The answer to the following questions will decide the lis between the parties in all these writ petitions:(1) What are the parameters of power of the All India Council for Technical Education over...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2019

Sathyabama vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Oct-03-2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON THURSDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 / 11TH ASWINA, 1941 CRL.A.No.286 OF 2004(B) AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 312/1998 DATED 28-01-2004...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 28 2012

A. Dhanapal Vs. K. Senthamarai

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-28-2012

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: T. Karunakaran, Advocate. For the Respondent: S. Jeevanandham, Advocate.

R. Banumathi, J. 1. M.P.No.1 of 2012 is filed by the Appellant seeking interim stay of order in I.A.No.919 of 2012 in O.S.No.250 of 2011 dated 31.03.2012 on the file of I Additional Family Court, Chennai....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2015

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation KUM Ltd. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-01-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Appeal against the fair and decretal order dated 22.12.2014 passed in M.C.O.P.No.2088 of 2013 by the IVth Judge, Small Causes Court, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chennai.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Being aggrieved by the finding,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2025

K. Nageshwari vs the Managing Director

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-2025

CRP No.354 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-11-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI CRP No.354 of 2025 1.K.Nageshwari 2.K.Shobiya 3.K.Shobika 4.K.Sharathi 5.Valliyammal 6.Perumal ... Petitioners Vs1. The Managing Director, TNSTC (Madurai Region), Virudhunagar.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2007

Chellamuthu and Vs. Krishnan,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-11-2007

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22, Rule 10

Reported in : 2007(4)CTC383; (2007)5MLJ1219

Advocate for Appellant : Sathyabama, Adv. for T.R. Rajaraman, Adv. and ;N. Jawahar, Adv.

P. Jyothimani, J.1. The unsuccessful defendants 3 and 4 in the Courts below are the appellants. The first respondent has filed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction, in respect of the suit property measuring 0.24.0...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2012

G. Krishnamurthy and Others Vs. Sarangapani and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellants: Ms. A. Sathyabama, T.R. Rajaraman, Advocates. For the Respondents: V. Srikanth, P. Nethaji, Advocates.

(Prayer: Cross Appeal filed under Section 41 Rule CPC praying that this Court may be pleased to allow the cross appeal and decree the plaintiff suit for mesne profits and exemplary costs.) 1. This appeal arises...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 2015

1.Karupayee Ammal Vs. The Revenue Divisional officer,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-21-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 08.2015 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.(MD)No.13005 of 2014 1.Karupayee Ammal 2.S.Sundaram 3.S.Kayampu 4.Sundarammal 5.S.Karuppiah 6.Govindhammal 7.S.Paramasivam 8.S.Eswaran 9.Kaleeswari 10.Ganesan 11.Kalidevi 12.Banumathy 13.P.Shanmugathai 14.S.Dhanabackiyam 15.G.Rathy 16.G.Sudha 17.G.Porkalai...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2003

Vinita Saxena Vs. Pankaj Pandit

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2003

Subject : FamilyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1)

Reported in : 17(2003)DLT44; II(2003)DMC506

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Dutt Salwan, Adv

S.K. Mahajan, J. 1. This order will dispose of the application of the appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condensation of delay in filing the appeal. A few facts giving rise to this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial