Advanced Search Results

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd., and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: A.L. Somayaji, T.V. Ramanujan, Senior Counsels, A. Mohan Advocates. For the Respondents: P.S. Raman Senior Counsel, R1 and R5, Poovayya, R2, Vineeth Subramani, R3, Sathish Parasaran, R4, V. Niranjan, Prashant Rajagopal, Advocate.

(Prayer: Original Second Appeals filed against the common order dated 30.09.2010 made in O.A.Nos.977 and 978 in C.S.No.832 of 2009 on the Original Side of this Court.) M. Duraiswamy, J. 1. The appellant in both the...

Tungabadra Sugar Works Mazdoor Sangh Represented by Its President Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 442, 446, 446(1), 456, 457, 529A, 530 and 537; Income Tax Act, 1961; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 17, 18, 19(7), 19(19), 19(22), 25 to 30, 32, 34, 34(1) and 34(2); State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 31 and 46B; Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948; Unit Trust of India Act, 1963; Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 - Sections 15 and 41; Income Tax Rules - Rules 38 and 52(2); Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 9 and 117; Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 136, 226 and 227

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ15

Advocate for Appellant : V. Prakash, Sr. Counsel for Ramapriya, Adv. in OSAs 59 and 60/09, ;Karthik Seshadri, Adv. in OSAs 61 to 63, 76 and 77/09 and ;Sathish Parasaran, Adv. in OSA 82/09

M. Chockalingam, J.1. All these appeals challenge a common order of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in C.A. Nos. 1811 of 2005, 854 of 2006 and 2740 to 2742 of 2007 in C.P....

Balaji Distilleries Ltd. Vs. the Secretary to Government, State of Tam ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1), 5(1), 13(4), 13A, 15 to 22, 22(1), 22(5), 22A and 25; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Regulations - Regulation 19 and 19(5); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1989; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 5 and 13(4); Companies Act, 1956; Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947; Gujarat Sales Tax Act; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1890; Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1864

Reported in : (2008)17VST59(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Sathish Parasaran, Adv.

ORDERS. Manikumar, J.1. The petitioner has sought for a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the order of the second respondent, in his impugned proceedings bearing reference in communication No. RC. 196/04/A2, dated April 10, 2007,...

Dr. J.S. Rajkumar and Another Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Cy ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioners: B. Kumar, Senior Counsel, Xavier Felix, Advocate. For Respondents: R1, M. Maharaja, Additional Public Prosecutor, R2, Sathish Parasaran, Advocate.

(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for records and quash the entire proceedings pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate at Alandur in C.C.No.520 of 2008 against the petitioner.) 1. This...

Madras Security Printers Rep. by Its Partner, P. Sam Prasad and Roseme ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tenders Act, 1998 - Sections 8 and 18(2); Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules, 2000 - Rules 17, 18 and 18(5)

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC24; (2008)220CTR(Mad)350; (2008)4MLJ601

Advocate for Appellant : R. Krishanmurthy, Sr. Counsel for ;Sathish Parasaran, Adv. in W.P. No. 2774/2008 and ;S. Parthasarathy, Sr. Counsel for ;V.C. Janardhanan, Adv. in W.P. No. 3508/2008

ORDERV. Dhanapalan, J.1. These two Writ Petitions have been filed, one by M/s. Madras Security Printers and the other by M/s. Rosemerta Technologies Pvt. Ltd., praying for a mandamus, directing the respondents to accept the petitioners'...

Ultra Tech Cement Limited Vs. the Secretary to Government, Commercial ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Sales Tax/VAT

Acts : Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 - Sections 31, 32, 33 and 33(1); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 17(4); Central Sales Tax Act; Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 84 and 85; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 48A; Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 - Rule 16(4)

Reported in : (2008)16VST481(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Sathish Parasaran, Adv.

ORDERS. Manikumar, J.1. The petitioner has sought a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the order of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Arokanam Village, Vellore District and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation...

M/S. United Spirits Limited Vs. Henkel India Limited and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Appellant: Sathish Parasaran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R2, Nalini Chidambaram, Senior Counsel for M/s.C. Daniel & Glady's Daniel, R1 & R3, P.S. Raman, Senior Counsel for M/s. C. Daniel & Glady's Daniel, Advocates.

(Prayer: Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the Original Side Rules read with clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 13 December 2011 in O.A.Nos.764 to 766 of 2011...

Waterfall Estate (East) Pvt. Limited, Rep. by Its Director and Waterfa ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act - Sections 33A; ;The Registration Act, 1908; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398 and 399

Reported in : [2007]138CompCas57(Mad); [2008]81SCL434(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Sathish Parasaran, Adv.

ORDERM.E.N. Patrudu, J.1. Whether remission of stamp duty for registering the document is permissible in the transfer of property between the parent and its subsidiary company?2. The said common question is involved hence common order is...

M/S. Gmmco Limited Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1978; Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 - Section 10(3)(a); Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Sathish Parasaran, Adv.

The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the order dated 13.1.2011 passed by the 5th respondent/The District Collector, Kancheepuram District and the consequential order of the 11th respondent/The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram Division, Kancheepuram...

G. Prashanthi Vs. the Tamil Nadu Dr. Mgr Medical University, Rep. by t ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner: Sathish Parasaran, Advocate. For the Respondents: R1 and R2 - Mrs. Narmadha Sampath, Advocate.

(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the first and second respondents to re-value the petitioner's answer sheet in the Minor Oral Surgery and...