Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: sat pal and · Page 1 of about 1,160 results (0.149 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 11 1989

Rajindernath Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-1989

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 39(1989)DLT238

Advocate for Appellant : Lalit Bhasin,; Sonia Afehta,; Sat Pal,;

Leila Seth, J.(1) By this writ petition the pethioner is praying for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as a Brigadier with original seniority and permit him to continue to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 1987

Jagannath Prasad Jhalani and Others Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commis ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-12-1987

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 23, 633 and 633(2); Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 14A and 14B; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1952; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 192; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 405, 406 and 409

Reported in : [1987]62CompCas571(Delhi); (1987)63CTR(Del)312; [1987]168ITR341(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bhandare

D.P. Wadhwa, J.1. This petition under section 633(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Act'), was filed on 4th September, 1984. Earlier, when the petition was filed, the petitioner company was known as M/s....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 1962

The State Vs. Sat Pal Sehgal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-06-1962

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bar Councils Act, 1926 - Sections 10(2) and 12

Reported in : AIR1963P& H39; 1963CriLJ60

Advocate for Appellant : N.L. Salooja, Adv. General; G.P. Jain, Adv.; Partap Sing

Mehar Singh, J.1. A case under Section 494 of the Penal Code, Kuldip Kaur v. Karanvir Singh of Patiala was tried in the Court of Thakar Surat Ram Mehantan, Magistrate of the First Class at Nahan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 1989

S. Balwinder Singh @ Chhinda Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-1989

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Conservation of foreign Exchange and prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3) and 9(1)

Reported in : 39(1989)DLT436

Advocate for Appellant : Trilok Kumar and; Sat Pal, Advs

Santosh Duggal, J. (1) The detenu, in this writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, was detained by virtue of an order oi detention passed on 9th March, 1988 by Shri K. L. Verma,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 22 1988

Murii Litaramani Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-22-1988

Subject : Direct TaxationCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 1989(2)Crimes103; 1988(15)DRJ407

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Bagai,; Sat Pal,; Rekha Agarwal and;

Malih Sharief-Ud-Din, J. (1) In this petition the order of detention of Murali Lilaramani passed on 5th of March 1988 is being challenged. The detention order was passed by Joint Secretary to Government of India under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1979

Gulab Raj Sharma Vs. Pushpa Devi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-09-1979

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi220

Advocate for Appellant : Sat Pal and; Shyam kishore, Advs

Rajindar Sachar, J.(1) This is an appeal by the husband against the dismissal of the petition brought by him for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter to be called the Act).(2) The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 1988

Ashok Kumar Jaggi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-1988

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1989CriLJ539; 1988(2)Crimes11; 35(1988)DLT151

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Arora,; Sat Pal,; Rekha Agarwal and;

Malik, J. (1) The petitioner was detained pursuant to an order dated 31st January 1987 passed under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (as amended) by Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1988

Reena Miechandani Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-11-1988

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 3(1) and 9

Reported in : 1989(2)Crimes637; 37(1989)DLT20; 1989(16)DRJ209

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Arora,; Sat Pal,; Maninder Singh,;

Malik Sharief-ud-din, J.(1) The petitioner has challenged the validity of the detention order dated 5th of February, 1988 passed under Section 3(1) read with Section 2(f) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and prevention of Smuggling...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 1989

Kishore Kumar Mundhra Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-31-1989

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 1990(2)Crimes67; 39(1989)DLT155; 1989(23)LC325(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : J.K. Srivastava,; Sat Pal,; Rekha Agarwal and;

P.K. Bahri, J.(1) This petition has been brought linker Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of detention order dated September 1. 1988, passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 16 1988

Director, Central Bureu Investication Vs. Ram Jethmalani

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-16-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19

Reported in : 35(1988)DLT34; 1988(15)DRJ19

Advocate for Appellant : B. Datta,; Sat Pal,; P.K. Behl,;

S.S. Chadha, J. (1) Shri Ram Jethmalani, the respondent in this appeal (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) is the plaintiff in a libel action instituted by him in the Queen's Bench Division of the High...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial