Advanced Search Results

State (Through Cbi) Vs. Santosh Kumar Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 6, 45 and 46; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302, 354 and 376; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161, 311 and 313

Reported in : 2007CriLJ964; 133(2006)DLT393; 2006(92)DRJ87

Advocate for Appellant : A. Sharan, ASG,; Ashok Bhan,; Amit Anand Tiwari,;

R.S. Sodhi, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 233 of 2000 seeks to challenge judgment dated 3rd December, 1999 of the Additional Sessions Judge in acquitting the respondent herein of the charges under Sections 302 and 376 IPC...

Rangnath and Others Vs. The Director, Ground Water Survey and Developm ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and by the consent of the parties, heard finally. 2. The three petitioners have preferred this petition for challenging the judgment and order dated 26/03/2013 delivered by the...

Naresh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 25, 27 and 60; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302

Reported in : 2002(4)MPHT553; 2002(4)MPLJ241

Advocate for Appellant : G.R. Deshmukh, Adv.

S.L. Jain, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and findings recorded by the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Raisen, in the Sessions Trial No. 66/89 whereby the accused/appellant has been convicted under Section 302...

Sarat Chandra Biswal and anr. Vs. Surendra Mohanty, Editor kalinga and ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 3, 4 and 5; Advocate Act, 1941 - Sections 49; Advocate Rules - Rules 3, 4 and 15

Reported in : AIR1969Ori117; 1969CriLJ763

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Behura, ;D. Bhuyan and ;J. Das, Advs. in Ori. Cr. Misc. Case No. 3 of 1968 and ;Adv. General in Ori. Cr. Misc. Case No. 4 of 1968

Barman, C.J. 1. Original Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 4 of 1968 of alleged contempt arises out of a petition of an unusual nature described as a 'representation petition'--without mention of opposite party and without any specific...

Singer India Ltd. Vs. Amita Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 10 and 96; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 53A and 107 Registration Act , 1908 - Sections 49

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1076; 88(2000)DLT186

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. and;Mr. Deepak Sabharwal Adv

ORDERArun Kumar, J. 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 23rd December, 1998 passed by Sh. P. S. Teji, Additional...

Santosh Kumar Biswas and Aslam Ansari Vs. State of Bihar Now Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 363, 366, 376 and 376(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 164

Reported in : [2007(2)JCR10(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : Jai Prakash in Cr.App.No. 58 of 2000 and;N.K. Sahani Adv. in Cr.App. No. 103 of 2000

R.R. Prasad, J.1. Since both the appeals arise out of common judgment it were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. The appellants, Santosh Kumar Biswas, and Aslam Ansari were put on...

Saurav Maharana Vs. Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinat ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2007(II)OLR595

R.N. Biswal, J.1. Petitioner being a minor has filed this writ petition through his father guardian assailing the decision under Annexure-12 taken by opp. parties 1 and 2 and seeking a direction to the opp. parties...

Santosh Kumar Padhy and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 420, 465, 468 and 471

Reported in : 1992CriLJ750

Advocate for Appellant : J.M. Das and ;S. Mohanty, Advs.

ORDERD.M. Patnaik, J.1. The above two revisions having arisen out of a common appellate judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jeypore are being disposed of by this common order.2. One Bighnaraj Tripathy was the Sharistadar...

Mul Chand Sharma Vs. Dainik Bhasker Corpn Ltd and Ors Chairman

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Santosh Kumar Tripathi

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.411 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.246 OF2011IN AVISHEK RAJA & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SANJAY GUPTA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.33 OF2015IN WP...

Amalesh Chandra and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 286, 288, 297, 307, 423 and 537; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 322, 323 and 325; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 60 and 167

Reported in : AIR1952Cal481

Advocate for Appellant : Santosh Kumar Basu, ;N.R. Das Gupta, ;Debabrata Mookerjee, ;Sudhangsu Bhusan Sen, ;Ajoy Kumar Basu and ;Prasun Chandra Ghose, Advs.

Harries, C.J.1. The appellants Sunil Chandra Roy and Satyendra Chandra Roy were convicted of offences which arose out of an incident which resulted in the death of Col. S. C. Mitra. These two appellants are brothers...